These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37620503)

  • 1. ChemFlow_py: a flexible toolkit for docking and rescoring.
    Monari L; Galentino K; Cecchini M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Nov; 37(11):565-572. PubMed ID: 37620503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
    Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ChemFlow─From 2D Chemical Libraries to Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies.
    Barreto Gomes DE; Galentino K; Sisquellas M; Monari L; Bouysset C; Cecchini M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Jan; 63(2):407-411. PubMed ID: 36603846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MILCDock: Machine Learning Enhanced Consensus Docking for Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
    Morris CJ; Stern JA; Stark B; Christopherson M; Della Corte D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5342-5350. PubMed ID: 36342217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization of compound ranking for structure-based virtual ligand screening using an established FRED-Surflex consensus approach.
    Du J; Bleylevens IW; Bitorina AV; Wichapong K; Nicolaes GA
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2014 Jan; 83(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 23941463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds.
    Chaput L; Mouawad L
    J Cheminform; 2017 Jun; 9(1):37. PubMed ID: 29086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ligand-Enhanced Negative Images Optimized for Docking Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving Docking Performance Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas S; Ahinko M; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Front Pharmacol; 2018; 9():260. PubMed ID: 29632488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. dockECR: Open consensus docking and ranking protocol for virtual screening of small molecules.
    Ochoa R; Palacio-Rodriguez K; Clemente CM; Adler NS
    J Mol Graph Model; 2021 Dec; 109():108023. PubMed ID: 34555725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rescoring and Linearly Combining: A Highly Effective Consensus Strategy for Virtual Screening Campaigns.
    Pedretti A; Mazzolari A; Gervasoni S; Vistoli G
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Apr; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 31027337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refinement and Rescoring of Virtual Screening Results.
    Rastelli G; Pinzi L
    Front Chem; 2019; 7():498. PubMed ID: 31355188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel insights of structure-based modeling for RNA-targeted drug discovery.
    Chen L; Calin GA; Zhang S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2741-53. PubMed ID: 22947071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discovery of high affinity ligands for β2-adrenergic receptor through pharmacophore-based high-throughput virtual screening and docking.
    Yakar R; Akten ED
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Sep; 53():148-160. PubMed ID: 25137647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing and improving the performance of consensus docking strategies using the DockBox package.
    Preto J; Gentile F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Sep; 33(9):817-829. PubMed ID: 31578656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Software Used and the Type of Target Protein on Molecular Docking Accuracy.
    Ivanova L; Karelson M
    Molecules; 2022 Dec; 27(24):. PubMed ID: 36558174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CompScore: Boosting Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performance by Incorporating Docking Scoring Function Components into Consensus Scoring.
    Perez-Castillo Y; Sotomayor-Burneo S; Jimenes-Vargas K; Gonzalez-Rodriguez M; Cruz-Monteagudo M; Armijos-Jaramillo V; Cordeiro MNDS; Borges F; Sánchez-Rodríguez A; Tejera E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3655-3666. PubMed ID: 31449403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discovery of binding proteins for a protein target using protein-protein docking-based virtual screening.
    Zhang C; Tang B; Wang Q; Lai L
    Proteins; 2014 Oct; 82(10):2472-82. PubMed ID: 24854898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.