These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3762099)

  • 1. Damping the hearing aid frequency response: effects on speech clarity and preferred listening level.
    Cox RM; Gilmore C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 3762099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preference for and performance with damped and undamped hearing aids by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Davis LA; Davidson SA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 8783128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Rehabilitation possibilities in presbycusis].
    Kapteyn TS
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 1982 Oct; 13(5):179-85. PubMed ID: 7147320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sound quality and speech reception for prescribed hearing aid frequency responses.
    Leijon A; Lindkvist A; Ringdahl A; Israelsson B
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 1783227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality rating test of hearing aid benefit in the NIDCD/VA Clinical Trial.
    Noffsinger D; Haskell GB; Larson VD; Williams DW; Wilson E; Plunkett S; Kenworthy D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 12195171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferred real-ear insertion gain on a commercial hearing aid at different speech and noise levels.
    Kuk FK; Harper T; Doubek K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Mar; 5(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 8180434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loudness discrimination of speech signals spectrally shaped by a simulated hearing aid.
    Rakerd B; Punch J; Hooks W; Amlani A; Vander Velde TJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 42(6):1285-94. PubMed ID: 10599612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of aided preferred listening levels for hearing aid gain prescription.
    Cox RM; Bisset JD
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 7075871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period.
    Munro KJ; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Feb; 44(2):92-101. PubMed ID: 15913157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Byrne D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):484-93. PubMed ID: 3745681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of several rationales for selecting hearing aid gain.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Aug; 51(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 3736027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferred hearing aid gain in everyday environments.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 1991 Apr; 12(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 2065837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between aided preferred listening level and long-term listening range.
    Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 6724174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of in-the-ear and over-the-ear hearing aid fittings.
    Cox RM; Risberg DM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Nov; 51(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 3773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.