163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37622581)
21. Evaluation of Online Artificial Intelligence-Generated Information on Common Hand Procedures.
Crook BS; Park CN; Hurley ET; Richard MJ; Pidgeon TS
J Hand Surg Am; 2023 Nov; 48(11):1122-1127. PubMed ID: 37690015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of Online Patient Education Material About Dysphagia.
Steiner SM; Slavych BK; Zraick RI
Dysphagia; 2023 Jun; 38(3):990-1000. PubMed ID: 36205800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing and Improving the Effectiveness of Online Patient Education Materials on Essential Vocal Tremor: A Comprehensive Evaluation.
Ho B; Hong EM; Benson BE
J Voice; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38493016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Glaucoma Questions Adapted From Patient Brochures.
Yalla GR; Hyman N; Hock LE; Zhang Q; Shukla AG; Kolomeyer NN
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56766. PubMed ID: 38650824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Artificial intelligence insights into osteoporosis: assessing ChatGPT's information quality and readability.
Erden Y; Temel MH; Bağcıer F
Arch Osteoporos; 2024 Mar; 19(1):17. PubMed ID: 38499716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of information accuracy and clarity: ChatGPT responses to the most frequently asked questions about premature ejaculation.
Şahin MF; Keleş A; Özcan R; Doğan Ç; Topkaç EC; Akgül M; Yazıci CM
Sex Med; 2024 Jun; 12(3):qfae036. PubMed ID: 38832125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation High-Quality of Information from ChatGPT (Artificial Intelligence-Large Language Model) Artificial Intelligence on Shoulder Stabilization Surgery.
Hurley ET; Crook BS; Lorentz SG; Danilkowicz RM; Lau BC; Taylor DC; Dickens JF; Anakwenze O; Klifto CS
Arthroscopy; 2024 Mar; 40(3):726-731.e6. PubMed ID: 37567487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Usefulness and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions for Neurosurgical Procedures.
Gajjar AA; Kumar RP; Paliwoda ED; Kuo CC; Adida S; Legarreta AD; Deng H; Anand SK; Hamilton DK; Buell TJ; Agarwal N; Gerszten PC; Hudson JS
Neurosurgery; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38353558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the reliability and readability of ChatGPT-4 responses regarding hypothyroidism during pregnancy.
Onder CE; Koc G; Gokbulut P; Taskaldiran I; Kuskonmaz SM
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):243. PubMed ID: 38167988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Readability Analysis and Accessibility of Online Materials About Transgender Voice Care.
Magrath WJ; Shneyderman M; Bauer TK; Neira P; Best S; Akst LM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Dec; 167(6):952-958. PubMed ID: 35671144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients.
Cocci A; Pezzoli M; Lo Re M; Russo GI; Asmundo MG; Fode M; Cacciamani G; Cimino S; Minervini A; Durukan E
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 Mar; 27(1):103-108. PubMed ID: 37516804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the Quality of Printed Online Education Materials in Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery.
Alwani MM; Campiti VJ; Bandali EH; Nesemeier BR; Ting JY; Shipchandler TZ
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2020; 22(4):255-261. PubMed ID: 32267787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the Current Status of Artificial Intelligence for Endourology Patient Education: A Blind Comparison of ChatGPT and Google Bard Against Traditional Information Resources.
Connors C; Gupta K; Khusid JA; Khargi R; Yaghoubian AJ; Levy M; Gallante B; Atallah W; Gupta M
J Endourol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38441078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Appropriateness and Readability of ChatGPT-4-Generated Responses for Surgical Treatment of Retinal Diseases.
Momenaei B; Wakabayashi T; Shahlaee A; Durrani AF; Pandit SA; Wang K; Mansour HA; Abishek RM; Xu D; Sridhar J; Yonekawa Y; Kuriyan AE
Ophthalmol Retina; 2023 Oct; 7(10):862-868. PubMed ID: 37277096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information on Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Simani L; Oron Y; Handzel O; Eta RA; Warshavsky A; Horowitz G; Muhanna N; Ungar OJ
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Feb; 43(2):159-164. PubMed ID: 34772890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quality and Readability of Online Information on In-Office Vocal Fold Injections.
Yi GS; Hu A
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Mar; 129(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 31701778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
Kong KA; Hu A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The quality and readability of patient information provided by ChatGPT: can AI reliably explain common ENT operations?
Abou-Abdallah M; Dar T; Mahmudzade Y; Michaels J; Talwar R; Tornari C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38530460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
