These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3762284)

  • 21. Auditory performance with simultaneous intracochlear multichannel stimulation.
    Parkin JL; Randolph LJ
    Laryngoscope; 1991 Apr; 101(4 Pt 1):379-83. PubMed ID: 1895853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term results of the multichannel cochlear implant.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Meyer B; Lacombe H
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():387-411. PubMed ID: 6575661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of promontory and cochlear implants within a single subject.
    Edgerton BJ; House WF; Doyle KJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):100-3. PubMed ID: 6805388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Complications and pitfalls of cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: a 6-year follow-up cohort study.
    Sainz M; Garcia-Valdecasas J; Ballesteros JM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1044-8. PubMed ID: 19395988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Experiences in Kiel with the cochlear implant].
    Müller-Deile J; Schmidt BJ; Rudert H
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jun; 73(6):300-10. PubMed ID: 8060448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Audiological results with the cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA; Brimacombe JA; Eisenberg LS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):27-34. PubMed ID: 6805394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Basic fitting and evaluation parameters of a newly designed cochlear implant electrode.
    Deman PR; Daemers K; Yperman M; Offeciers FE; Plasmans A; Van Dijk B; Govaerts PJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Apr; 124(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 15141756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Experiences with the implantation of a multichannel electrode in the acoustic nerve].
    Naumann HH; Zwicker E; Scherer H; Seifert J; Leysieffer H; Zollner M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3754920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of cochlear implants in children: long term results.
    Peixoto MC; Spratley J; Oliveira G; Martins J; Bastos J; Ribeiro C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 77(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 23291164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of the number of active electrodes on tone and speech perception by Nucleus 22 cochlear implant users with SPEAK strategy.
    Hsu CJ; Horng MJ; Fu QJ
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():257-9. PubMed ID: 11892162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cochlear function following implantation with a full electrode array.
    Obholzer RJ; Gibson WP
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 21756458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
    Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multichannel (Ineraid) cochlear implant update.
    Parkin JL; Randolph LJ; Parkin BD
    Laryngoscope; 1993 Aug; 103(8):835-40. PubMed ID: 8361283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
    Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.