204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37623295)
1. Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Occlusal Splint Materials.
Prpic V; Spehar F; Stajdohar D; Bjelica R; Cimic S; Par M
Dent J (Basel); 2023 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 37623295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the mechanical properties of pressed, milled, and 3D-printed resins for occlusal devices.
Berli C; Thieringer FM; Sharma N; Müller JA; Dedem P; Fischer J; Rohr N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):780-786. PubMed ID: 31955837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexural Properties and Hardness of CAD-CAM Denture Base Materials.
Fouda SM; Gad MM; Abualsaud R; Ellakany P; AlRumaih HS; Khan SQ; Akhtar S; Al-Qarni FD; Al-Harbi FA
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):318-324. PubMed ID: 35567362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study of the flexural strength and surface hardness of different materials and technologies for occlusal device fabrication.
Prpic V; Slacanin I; Schauperl Z; Catic A; Dulcic N; Cimic S
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):955-959. PubMed ID: 30711296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wear resistance and flexural properties of low force SLA- and DLP-printed splint materials in different printing orientations: An in vitro study.
Simeon P; Unkovskiy A; Saadat Sarmadi B; Nicic R; Koch PJ; Beuer F; Schmidt F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106458. PubMed ID: 38364445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical and physical properties of splint materials for oral appliances produced by additive, subtractive and conventional manufacturing.
Maleki T; Meinen J; Coldea A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38851965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed, CAD/CAM, and Conventional Denture Base Materials.
Prpić V; Schauperl Z; Ćatić A; Dulčić N; Čimić S
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):524-528. PubMed ID: 32270904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strength and Surface Properties of a 3D-Printed Denture Base Polymer.
Gad MM; Fouda SM; Abualsaud R; Alshahrani FA; Al-Thobity AM; Khan SQ; Akhtar S; Ateeq IS; Helal MA; Al-Harbi FA
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):412-418. PubMed ID: 34347351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of hardness and polishability of various occlusal splint materials.
Grymak A; Aarts JM; Ma S; Waddell JN; Choi JJE
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104270. PubMed ID: 33341739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Salivary pH on the Flexural Strength and Surface Properties of CAD/CAM Denture Base Materials.
Alzaid M; AlToraibily F; Al-Qarni FD; Al-Thobity AM; Akhtar S; Ali S; Al-Harbi FA; Gad MM
Eur J Dent; 2023 Feb; 17(1):234-241. PubMed ID: 35820440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of adding a hard-reline material on the flexural strength of conventional, 3D-printed, and milled denture base materials.
Li R; Malik D; Sadid-Zadeh R
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):796.e1-796.e7. PubMed ID: 37121624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material.
Perea-Lowery L; Gibreel M; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104254. PubMed ID: 33333480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of occlusal splint materials: CAD-CAM versus conventional resins.
Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104813. PubMed ID: 34530298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of the Surface and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printable Denture-Base Resin Material and Conventional Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA).
Al-Dwairi ZN; Al Haj Ebrahim AA; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 35119168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Effect of Different Construction Techniques of CAD-CAM Milled, 3D-Printed, and Polyamide Denture Base Resins on Flexural Strength: An In Vitro Comparative Study.
Zeidan AAE; Sherif AF; Baraka Y; Abualsaud R; Abdelrahim RA; Gad MM; Helal MA
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 35343012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Analysis between Conventional Acrylic, CAD/CAM Milled, and 3D CAD/CAM Printed Occlusal Splints.
Abad-Coronel C; Ruano Espinosa C; Ordóñez Palacios S; Paltán CA; Fajardo JI
Materials (Basel); 2023 Sep; 16(18):. PubMed ID: 37763547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Printing Layer Thickness and Postprinting Conditions on the Flexural Strength and Hardness of a 3D-Printed Resin.
Alshamrani AA; Raju R; Ellakwa A
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():8353137. PubMed ID: 35237691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Evaluation of TiO
AlGhamdi MA; Fouda SM; Taymour N; Akhtar S; Khan SQ; Ali MS; Elakel AM; Nassar EA; Gad MM
Nanomaterials (Basel); 2023 Nov; 13(23):. PubMed ID: 38063757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus comparisons of three differently cured denture base systems.
Ali IL; Yunus N; Abu-Hassan MI
J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):545-9. PubMed ID: 18761582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-body wear and surface hardness of occlusal splint materials.
Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Garoushi S; Lassila L
Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):916-922. PubMed ID: 36288940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
