These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37623673)

  • 1. Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Its 3D-Printed Quantitate Assessment in Cranial Reconstruction.
    Moiduddin K; Mian SH; Elseufy SM; Alkhalefah H; Ramalingam S; Sayeed A
    J Funct Biomater; 2023 Aug; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 37623673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty.
    Zhang J; Su Y; Rao X; Pang H; Zhu H; Liu L; Chen L; Li D; He J; Peng J; Jiang Y
    Int J Bioprint; 2023; 9(1):634. PubMed ID: 36844244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptive Mechanism for Designing a Personalized Cranial Implant and Its 3D Printing Using PEEK.
    Mian SH; Moiduddin K; Elseufy SM; Alkhalefah H
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 35335596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design of customized implants and 3D printing of symmetric and asymmetric cranial cavities.
    Singh HN; Agrawal S; Kuthe AM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106061. PubMed ID: 37544200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
    Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design, Analysis, and 3D Printing of a Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone Implant for the Reconstruction of Zygomatic Deformities.
    Moiduddin K; Mian SH; Umer U; Alkhalefah H; Ahmed F; Hashmi FH
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Feb; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 36850170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS.
    Wu W; Geng P; Li G; Zhao D; Zhang H; Zhao J
    Materials (Basel); 2015 Sep; 8(9):5834-5846. PubMed ID: 28793537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative Assessment of Point-of-Care 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cranial Implants.
    Sharma N; Aghlmandi S; Dalcanale F; Seiler D; Zeilhofer HF; Honigmann P; Thieringer FM
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 34445228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of printing path and material components on mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone/hydroxyapatite composites.
    Zheng J; Kang J; Sun C; Yang C; Wang L; Li D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jun; 118():104475. PubMed ID: 33773239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Multi-Criteria Assessment Strategy for 3D Printed Porous Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Patient-Specific Implants for Orbital Wall Reconstruction.
    Sharma N; Welker D; Aghlmandi S; Maintz M; Zeilhofer HF; Honigmann P; Seifert T; Thieringer FM
    J Clin Med; 2021 Aug; 10(16):. PubMed ID: 34441859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-strength, surface-porous polyether-ether-ketone for load-bearing orthopedic implants.
    Evans NT; Torstrick FB; Lee CS; Dupont KM; Safranski DL; Chang WA; Macedo AE; Lin AS; Boothby JM; Whittingslow DC; Carson RA; Guldberg RE; Gall K
    Acta Biomater; 2015 Feb; 13():159-67. PubMed ID: 25463499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Steam Sterilization Affect the Accuracy of Point-of-Care 3D Printed Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Customized Cranial Implants? An Investigative Analysis.
    Sharma N; Zubizarreta-Oteiza J; Tourbier C; Thieringer FM
    J Clin Med; 2023 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 37048579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Homogenous scaffold-based cranial/skull implant modelling and structural analysis-unit cell algorithm-meshless approach.
    Phanindra Bogu V; Ravi Kumar Y; Kumar Khanra A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Nov; 55(11):2053-2065. PubMed ID: 28474182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fabrication and in vitro study of 3D novel porous hydroxyapatite/polyether ether ketone surface nanocomposite.
    Almasi D; Lau WJ; Rasaee S; Abbasi K
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Apr; 110(4):838-847. PubMed ID: 34788503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Surface Topography and Chemistry on Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Titanium Osseointegration.
    Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Safranski DL; Potter D; Sulchek T; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Apr; 45(8):E417-E424. PubMed ID: 31703050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-specific 3D printed Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) dental implant system.
    Sonaye SY; Bokam VK; Saini A; Nayak VV; Witek L; Coelho PG; Bhaduri SB; Bottino MC; Sikder P
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Dec; 136():105510. PubMed ID: 36244326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D printed porous PEEK created via fused filament fabrication for osteoconductive orthopaedic surfaces.
    Spece H; Yu T; Law AW; Marcolongo M; Kurtz SM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Sep; 109():103850. PubMed ID: 32543413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.
    Laratta JL; Vivace BJ; López-Peña M; Guzón FM; Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A; Jorge-Mora A; Villar-Liste RM; Pino-Lopez L; Lukyanchuk A; Taghizadeh EA; Pino-Minguez J
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1016-1027. PubMed ID: 34906741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cranial Implant Manufactured with PMMA and PEEK: A Mechanical Comparative Study.
    Moncayo-Matute FP; Vázquez-Silva E; Peña-Tapia PG; Torres-Jara PB; Moya-Loaiza DP; Viloria-Ávila TJ
    Polymers (Basel); 2023 Sep; 15(17):. PubMed ID: 37688247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applications of 3D-Printed PEEK via Fused Filament Fabrication: A Systematic Review.
    Dua R; Rashad Z; Spears J; Dunn G; Maxwell M
    Polymers (Basel); 2021 Nov; 13(22):. PubMed ID: 34833346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.