These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37623673)
41. 3D-printed PEEK implant for mandibular defects repair - a new method. Kang J; Zhang J; Zheng J; Wang L; Li D; Liu S J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Apr; 116():104335. PubMed ID: 33494021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Mechanical characterization and numerical simulation of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cranial implants. El Halabi F; Rodriguez JF; Rebolledo L; Hurtós E; Doblaré M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):1819-32. PubMed ID: 22098881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Multiscale Porous Poly (Ether-Ether-Ketone) Structures Manufactured by Powder Bed Fusion Process. Liu Y; Davies R; Yi N; McCutchion P; Chen B; Ghita O 3D Print Addit Manuf; 2024 Feb; 11(1):219-230. PubMed ID: 38389676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Composites Based on 3D-Printing Technology for Orthopedic and Dental Applications. Han X; Yang D; Yang C; Spintzyk S; Scheideler L; Li P; Li D; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Rupp F J Clin Med; 2019 Feb; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 30759863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of titanium and Cfr-peek additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) on maxilla. Altıparmak N; Polat S; Onat S J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 124(1S):101290. PubMed ID: 36152972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Improving PEEK bioactivity for craniofacial reconstruction using a 3D printed scaffold embedded with mesenchymal stem cells. Roskies M; Jordan JO; Fang D; Abdallah MN; Hier MP; Mlynarek A; Tamimi F; Tran SD J Biomater Appl; 2016 Jul; 31(1):132-9. PubMed ID: 26980549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Porous PEEK improves the bone-implant interface compared to plasma-sprayed titanium coating on PEEK. Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Potter D; Safranski DL; Sulchek TA; Gall K; Guldberg RE Biomaterials; 2018 Dec; 185():106-116. PubMed ID: 30236838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Fused Filament Fabrication of PEEK: A Review of Process-Structure-Property Relationships. Zanjanijam AR; Major I; Lyons JG; Lafont U; Devine DM Polymers (Basel); 2020 Jul; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 32726994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Rapid high-fidelity contour shaping of titanium mesh implants for cranioplasty defects using patient-specific molds created with low-cost 3D printing: A case series. Kinsman M; Aljuboori Z; Ball T; Nauta H; Boakye M Surg Neurol Int; 2020; 11():288. PubMed ID: 33033650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. On the mechanical aspect of additive manufactured polyether-ether-ketone scaffold for repair of large bone defects. Naghavi SA; Sun C; Hejazi M; Tamaddon M; Zheng J; Wang L; Zhang C; Varma SN; Li D; Moazen M; Wang L; Liu C Biomater Transl; 2022; 3(2):142-151. PubMed ID: 36105563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Three-Dimensionally-Printed Polyether-Ether-Ketone Implant with a Cross-Linked Structure and Acid-Etched Microporous Surface Promotes Integration with Soft Tissue. Feng X; Yu H; Liu H; Yu X; Feng Z; Bai S; Zhao Y Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Aug; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 31382697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. 3D printing of PEEK and its composite to increase biointerfaces as a biomedical material- A review. Oladapo BI; Zahedi SA; Ismail SO; Omigbodun FT Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2021 Jul; 203():111726. PubMed ID: 33865088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Getting PEEK to Stick to Bone: The Development of Porous PEEK for Interbody Fusion Devices. Torstrick FB; Safranski DL; Burkus JK; Chappuis JL; Lee CSD; Guldberg RE; Gall K; Smith KE Tech Orthop; 2017 Sep; 32(3):158-166. PubMed ID: 29225416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Customizable cap implants for neurophysiological experimentation. Blonde JD; Roussy M; Luna R; Mahmoudian B; Gulli RA; Barker KC; Lau JC; Martinez-Trujillo JC J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Jul; 304():103-117. PubMed ID: 29694848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. An Immunologic and Biomechanical Comparison of Polyether Ether Ketone-Zeolite and Polyether Ether Ketone Interbody Fusion Devices. Cheng BC; Swink I; McClain EJ; Vyas PS; Muzzonigro T; Carbone J; Zaidi A; Long JD; Altman DT; Yu AK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Aug; 48(16):1174-1180. PubMed ID: 37235799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An In Vitro Study of Osteoblast Response on Fused-Filament Fabrication 3D Printed PEEK for Dental and Cranio-Maxillofacial Implants. Han X; Sharma N; Xu Z; Scheideler L; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Rupp F; Thieringer FM; Spintzyk S J Clin Med; 2019 May; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 31159171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Biomechanical Behavior of an Implant System Using Polyether Ether Ketone Bar: Finite Element Analysis. Jaros OAL; De Carvalho GAP; Franco ABG; Kreve S; Lopes PAB; Dias SC J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2018; 8(5):446-450. PubMed ID: 30430073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Can Polyether Ether Ketone Dethrone Titanium as the Choice Implant Material for Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery? Kumar N; Ramakrishnan SA; Lopez KG; Madhu S; Ramos MRD; Fuh JYH; Hallinan J; Nolan CP; Benneker LM; Vellayappan BA World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():94-109. PubMed ID: 33508491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Modelling and structural analysis of skull/cranial implant: beyond mid-line deformities. Bogu VP; Kumar YR; Kumar Khanara A Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 28552926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Custom design and biomechanical analysis of 3D-printed PEEK rib prostheses. Kang J; Wang L; Yang C; Wang L; Yi C; He J; Li D Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Aug; 17(4):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 29730771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]