157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37624426)
21. Systematic assessment of complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective study using Clavien-Dindo classification, 5-year experience.
Degerli MS; Canturk AO; Bozkurt H; Alpay O; Akinci M; Altundal YE; Yildiz T; Yildirim D
Malawi Med J; 2022 Mar; 34(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 37265825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Comparison of complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy].
Lan X; Xi H; Zhang K; Cui J; Li M; Chen L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):184-189. PubMed ID: 28226353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic vs. open resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma.
Hong D; Tabet J; Anvari M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Jan; 44(1):10-8; discussion 18-9. PubMed ID: 11805558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does a Combination of Laparoscopic Approach and Full Fast Track Multimodal Management Decrease Postoperative Morbidity?: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Maggiori L; Rullier E; Lefevre JH; Régimbeau JM; Berdah S; Karoui M; Loriau J; Alvès A; Vicaut E; Panis Y
Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):729-737. PubMed ID: 28806303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of laparoscopic approach for anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer.
Kwak JM; Kim SH; Son DN; Kim J; Lee SI; Min BW; Um JW; Moon HY
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011; 21(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 21194304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic versus open reintervention for anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive colorectal surgery.
Lee CM; Huh JW; Yun SH; Kim HC; Lee WY; Park YA; Cho YB; Chun HK
Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):931-6. PubMed ID: 25060688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Conventional Epidural vs Transversus Abdominis Plane Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Randomized Trial in Colorectal Surgery.
Torgeson M; Kileny J; Pfeifer C; Narkiewicz L; Obi S
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Jul; 227(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 29723578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Application of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Combined with Transversus Abdominis Plane Block to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial].
Huang W; Yu TY; Long WF; Xiao JB
Zhen Ci Yan Jiu; 2018 Oct; 43(10):611-5. PubMed ID: 30365254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.
Zaghiyan KN; Mendelson BJ; Eng MR; Ovsepyan G; Mirocha JM; Fleshner P
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 Feb; 62(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 30540660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in Elderly Patients-A Single-Center Experience.
Wabitsch S; Haber PK; Ekwelle N; Kästner A; Krenzien F; Benzing C; Atanasov G; Bellingrath JS; Bauer G; Schöning W; Öllinger R; Pratschke J; Schmelzle M
J Surg Res; 2019 Jul; 239():92-97. PubMed ID: 30822696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections.
Peterson CY; Palazzi K; Parsons JK; Chang DC; Ramamoorthy SL
Surg Endosc; 2014 Feb; 28(2):608-16. PubMed ID: 24091552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is safe, feasible and effective in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a prospective single center study.
Crucitti A; Mazzari A; Tomaiuolo PM; Dionisi P; Diamanti P; Di Flumeri G; Donini LM; Bossola M
Minerva Chir; 2020 Jun; 75(3):157-163. PubMed ID: 32083412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Impact of Enhanced Recovery Protocol Compliance on Elective Colorectal Cancer Resection: Results From an International Registry.
ERAS Compliance Group
Ann Surg; 2015 Jun; 261(6):1153-9. PubMed ID: 25671587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice.
Hassan I; You YN; Cima RR; Larson DW; Dozois EJ; Barnes SA; Pemberton JH
Surg Endosc; 2008 Mar; 22(3):739-43. PubMed ID: 17704883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?
Dapri G; Himpens J; Cadière GB
Surg Endosc; 2008 Apr; 22(4):1060-9. PubMed ID: 18071806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Keller DS; Delaney CP; Hashemi L; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4220-8. PubMed ID: 26715021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analgesic efficacy of preemptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial.
Pedrazzani C; Park SY; Scotton G; Park JS; Kim HJ; Polati E; Guglielmi A; Choi GS
Trials; 2019 Jul; 20(1):391. PubMed ID: 31266529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Feng Q; Yuan W; Li T; Tang B; Jia B; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Zhao R; Zhang C; Cheng L; Zhang X; Liang F; He G; Wei Y; Xu J;
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):991-1004. PubMed ID: 36087608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.
Shida D; Tagawa K; Inada K; Nasu K; Seyama Y; Maeshiro T; Miyamoto S; Inoue S; Umekita N
BMC Surg; 2017 Feb; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 28209144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Indwelling Urinary Catheter for Total Joint Arthroplasty Using Epidural Anesthesia.
Scotting OJ; North WT; Chen C; Charters MA
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2324-2328. PubMed ID: 31303377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
