These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3762492)

  • 1. Rapid identification of yeasts by semi-automated and conventional methods.
    Qadri SM; Flournoy DJ; Qadri SG; Ramirez EG
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1986; 175(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 3762492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a modified dye pour-plate auxanographic method for the rapid identification of clinically significant yeasts. Comparison with two commercial systems.
    Weymann LH; Stager CE; Qadri SG; Villarreal A; Qadri SM
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1979 Mar; 167(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 375051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species isolated from bovine intramammary infection.
    Fadda ME; Pisano MB; Scaccabarozzi L; Mossa V; Deplano M; Moroni P; Liciardi M; Cosentino S
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):7692-7. PubMed ID: 24119798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.
    Land GA; Harrison BA; Hulme KL; Cooper BH; Byrd JC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 385621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Collaborative evaluation of the Abbott yeast identification system.
    Cooper BH; Prowant S; Alexander B; Brunson DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 6381526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variation in Microbial Identification System accuracy for yeast identification depending on commercial source of Sabouraud dextrose agar.
    Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):2080-3. PubMed ID: 10325387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the new Mycotube test-kit for yeast identification.
    Guinet RM
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 4(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3886377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Baxter-MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system.
    Land GA; Salkin IF; el-Zaatari M; McGinnis MR; Hashem G
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 1653786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of two commercialized systems for the rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Quindós G; Lipperheide V; Pontón J
    Mycoses; 1993; 36(9-10):299-303. PubMed ID: 8015561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple disk-diffusion test for differentiation of yeast species.
    Sobczak H
    J Med Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 20(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 3906135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tube carbohydrate assimilation method for the rapid indentification of clinically significant yeasts.
    Qadri SM; Nichols CW
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1978 May; 165(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 351362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
    Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of the Iatron serological Candida check kit and the API 20C kit for identification of medically important Candida species.
    Shinoda T; Kaufman L; Padhye AA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 7016900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of rapid auxanographic procedures for recognition of an atypical Candida.
    Baker JG; Salkin IF; Pincus DH; D'Amato RF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Apr; 13(4):652-4. PubMed ID: 7014613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Pro-Lab ID ring system for the identification of medically important yeasts.
    Sekhon AS; Padhye AA; Garg AK; Rae R
    Mycopathologia; 1992 Jul; 119(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1406902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a commercial multitest system for identification of yeasts.
    Qadri SM; Nichols CW
    Am J Med Technol; 1978 May; 44(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 354378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.