These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3762492)

  • 21. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of RapID yeast plus system with API 20C system for identification of common, new, and emerging yeast pathogens.
    Espinel-Ingroff A; Stockman L; Roberts G; Pincus D; Pollack J; Marler J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Apr; 36(4):883-6. PubMed ID: 9542903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Contamination of dairy products by yeasts-like fungi].
    Białasiewicz D; Kłosiński M
    Wiad Parazytol; 2001; 47(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16894745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of Autobac 1 for rapid assimilation testing of Candida and Torulopsis species.
    Ngui Yen JH; Smith JA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Feb; 7(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 344333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Riddle DL; Giger O; Miller L; Hall GS; Woods GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 8160633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simple strategy for direct identification of medically important yeast species from positive blood culture vials.
    Sheppard DC; René P; Harris AD; Miller MA; Laverdière M; deSouza E; Robson HG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):2040-1. PubMed ID: 10325374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.
    el-Zaatari M; Pasarell L; McGinnis MR; Buckner J; Land GA; Salkin IF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Sep; 28(9):1938-41. PubMed ID: 2229376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the Biolog MicroStation system for yeast identification.
    McGinnis MR; Molina TC; Pierson DL; Mishra SK
    J Med Vet Mycol; 1996; 34(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 8912169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rapid methods for identification of yeasts.
    Huppert M; Harper G; Sun SH; Delanerolle V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Jul; 2(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 1241586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identification of clinical yeast isolates by using the Microring YT.
    McGowan KL; Mortensen JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 8432801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Update and evaluation of the AutoMicrobic yeast identification system.
    Land G; Stotler R; Land K; Staneck J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):649-52. PubMed ID: 6386872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are the Conventional Commercial Yeast Identification Methods Still Helpful in the Era of New Clinical Microbiology Diagnostics? A Meta-Analysis of Their Accuracy.
    Posteraro B; Efremov L; Leoncini E; Amore R; Posteraro P; Ricciardi W; Sanguinetti M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 53(8):2439-50. PubMed ID: 25994160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Identification of yeast-like fungi: evaluation of 4 commercial systems].
    Russolo S; Sala A; Crotti D
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Dec; 20(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 6399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improved auxanographic method for yeast assimilations: a comparison with other approaches.
    Land GA; Vinton EC; Adcock GB; Hopkins JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Sep; 2(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 1176628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of a new system for the rapid identification of clinically important yeasts.
    Segal E; Ajello L
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Aug; 4(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 965478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Evaluation of the API20C AUX system for the identification of clinically important yeasts].
    Silva JO; Candido RC
    Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2005; 38(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 15895181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Susceptibility of clinical isolates of yeasts to anti-fungal agents.
    Hussain Qadri SM; Flournoy DJ; Qadri SG; Ramirez EG
    Mycopathologia; 1986 Sep; 95(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 3773980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. YEAST PANEL multiplex PCR for identification of clinically important yeast species: stepwise diagnostic strategy, useful for developing countries.
    Arastehfar A; Fang W; Pan W; Lackner M; Liao W; Badiee P; Zomorodian K; Badali H; Hagen F; Lass-Flörl C; Boekhout T
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Feb; 93(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 30377018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.