156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37625919)
1. The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward.
Keener SK; Kepes S; Torka AK
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Sep; 239():104005. PubMed ID: 37625919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Big team science initiatives: A catalyst for trustworthy advancements in IO psychology.
Kreamer LM; Cobb HR; Castille C; Cogswell J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104101. PubMed ID: 38064907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse?
Motyl M; Demos AP; Carsel TS; Hanson BE; Melton ZJ; Mueller AB; Prims JP; Sun J; Washburn AN; Wong KM; Yantis C; Skitka LJ
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Jul; 113(1):34-58. PubMed ID: 28447837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports.
Ellis RJ
eNeuro; 2022; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 35922130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Science as collaborative knowledge generation.
Ellemers N
Br J Soc Psychol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 33616965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.
Fraser H; Parker T; Nakagawa S; Barnett A; Fidler F
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200303. PubMed ID: 30011289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis.
Shrout PE; Rodgers JL
Annu Rev Psychol; 2018 Jan; 69():487-510. PubMed ID: 29300688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education.
Maggio L; Dong T; Driessen E; Artino A
Perspect Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 8(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 30915714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability.
Ulrich R; Miller J
Elife; 2020 Sep; 9():. PubMed ID: 32930092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.
Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation.
Olsen J; Mosen J; Voracek M; Kirchler E
R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Dec; 6(12):190738. PubMed ID: 31903199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices.
Sacco DF; Bruton SV; Brown M
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 29179623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practical tools and strategies for researchers to increase replicability.
Nuijten MB
Dev Med Child Neurol; 2019 May; 61(5):535-539. PubMed ID: 30294813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards the enhancement of quality publication practices in clinical psychological science.
Waters AM; LeBeau RT; Young KS; Dowell TL; Ryan KM
Behav Res Ther; 2020 Jan; 124():103499. PubMed ID: 31751896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thinking About Data, Research Methods, and Statistical Analyses: Commentary on Sijtsma's (2014) "Playing with Data".
Waldman ID; Lilienfeld SO
Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 25820981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Crisis Ahead? Why Human-Robot Interaction User Studies May Have Replicability Problems and Directions for Improvement.
Leichtmann B; Nitsch V; Mara M
Front Robot AI; 2022; 9():838116. PubMed ID: 35360497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison.
Rabelo ALA; Farias JEM; Sarmet MM; Joaquim TCR; Hoersting RC; Victorino L; Modesto JGN; Pilati R
Int J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 55(4):674-683. PubMed ID: 31745980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What counts as good science? How the battle for methodological legitimacy affects public psychology.
Lewis NA
Am Psychol; 2021 Nov; 76(8):1323-1333. PubMed ID: 35113596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Replication initiatives will not salvage the trustworthiness of psychology.
Coyne JC
BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):28. PubMed ID: 27245324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. It's Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation: Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science.
Tackett JL; Lilienfeld SO; Patrick CJ; Johnson SL; Krueger RF; Miller JD; Oltmanns TF; Shrout PE
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Sep; 12(5):742-756. PubMed ID: 28972844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
