These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37628013)

  • 21. Consumer perception of health properties and of other attributes of beef as determinants of consumption and purchase decisions.
    Gutkowska K; Czarnecki J; Głąbska D; Guzek D; Batóg A
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2018; 69(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 30525333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Consumers' view on pork: Consumption motives and production preferences in ten European Union and four non-European Union countries.
    Lin-Schilstra L; Backus G; Snoek H; Mörlein D
    Meat Sci; 2022 May; 187():108736. PubMed ID: 35123247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.
    Wang J; Shen M; Gao Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30563258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Understanding consumers' perceptions towards Iberian pig production and animal welfare.
    García-Gudiño J; Blanco-Penedo I; Gispert M; Brun A; Perea J; Font-I-Furnols M
    Meat Sci; 2021 Feb; 172():108317. PubMed ID: 32980720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Elemental composition of pork meat from conventional and animal welfare farms by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and ICP-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and their authentication via multivariate chemometric analysis.
    Song OY; Islam MA; Son JH; Jeong JY; Kim HE; Yeon LS; Khan N; Jamila N; Kim KS
    Meat Sci; 2021 Feb; 172():108344. PubMed ID: 33096429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do consumers prefer pasture-raised dual-purpose cattle when considering meat products? A hypothetical discrete choice experiment for the case of minced beef.
    Schulze M; Spiller A; Risius A
    Meat Sci; 2021 Jul; 177():108494. PubMed ID: 33780871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors influencing consumer demand for U.S. pork exported to the Republic of Korea (South Korea).
    Vonada ML; Bidner BS; Belk KE; McKeith FK; Lloyd WR; O'Connor ME; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Apr; 79(4):907-11. PubMed ID: 11325196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consumer preferences for reduced antibiotic use in Danish pig production.
    Denver S; Jensen JD; Christensen T
    Prev Vet Med; 2021 Apr; 189():105310. PubMed ID: 33667759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determinants of consumer intention to purchase animal-friendly milk.
    de Graaf S; Van Loo EJ; Bijttebier J; Vanhonacker F; Lauwers L; Tuyttens FAM; Verbeke W
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Oct; 99(10):8304-8313. PubMed ID: 27474987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Update on animal welfare perception by Italian consumers: A descriptive survey.
    Rubini G; Nannoni E; Di Pasquale J; Martelli G; Sardi L
    Ital J Food Saf; 2021 Sep; 10(3):9588. PubMed ID: 34703792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Review: Pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part I. Carcass and fresh meat.
    Lebret B; Čandek-Potokar M
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100402. PubMed ID: 34836808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Which product characteristics are preferred by Chinese consumers when choosing pork? A conjoint analysis on perceived quality of selected pork attributes.
    Ma XQ; Verkuil JM; Reinbach HC; Meinert L
    Food Sci Nutr; 2017 May; 5(3):770-775. PubMed ID: 28572967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. U.S. perspective: Meat demand outdoes meat avoidance.
    Tonsor GT; Lusk JL
    Meat Sci; 2022 Aug; 190():108843. PubMed ID: 35569324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Consumers' Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare.
    Alonso ME; González-Montaña JR; Lomillos JM
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Feb; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 32120935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Environmental aspects of ethical animal production.
    Siegford JM; Powers W; Grimes-Casey HG
    Poult Sci; 2008 Feb; 87(2):380-6. PubMed ID: 18212385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meat avoidance: motives, alternative proteins and diet quality in a sample of Swiss consumers.
    Hagmann D; Siegrist M; Hartmann C
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Sep; 22(13):2448-2459. PubMed ID: 31159899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consumer perception of marbling and beef quality during purchase and consumer preferences for degree of doneness.
    Benli H; Yildiz DG
    Anim Biosci; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1274-1284. PubMed ID: 37170519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Credence cues of pork are more important than consumers' culinary skills to boost their purchasing intention.
    Argemí-Armengol I; Villalba D; Ripoll G; Teixeira A; Álvarez-Rodríguez J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():11-21. PubMed ID: 30954794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Review: Pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part II. Processed pork products.
    Lebret B; Čandek-Potokar M
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100383. PubMed ID: 34750079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Health Risk Perception, Consumption Intention, and Willingness to Pay for Pig Products Obtained by Immunocastration.
    Di Pasquale J; Vecchio Y; Martelli G; Sardi L; Adinolfi F; Nannoni E
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32883019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.