These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37628259)

  • 21. Time-Lapsing Perfusion: Proof of Concept of a Novel Method to Study Drug Delivery in Whole Organs.
    Diem AK; Valen-Sendstad K
    Biophys J; 2019 Dec; 117(12):2316-2323. PubMed ID: 31648790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis.
    Guo W; Lin Y; Taniguchi A; Zhu Y; Tripathi P; Yang S; Liu J; Yun H; Jin H; Zhang J; Yang J; Zeng M
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 33409778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tissue-growth-based synthetic tree generation and perfusion simulation.
    Kim HJ; Rundfeldt HC; Lee I; Lee S
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2023 Jun; 22(3):1095-1112. PubMed ID: 36869925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of myocardial perfusion parameters in an ex-vivo porcine heart model using third generation dual-source CT.
    Pelgrim GJ; Duguay TM; Stijnen JM; Varga-Szemes A; Van Tuijl S; Schoepf UJ; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 28202246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Association of coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiac muscle injury in acute myocardial infarction: results of comparison of dynamic SPECT and cardiac MRI.
    Mochula AV; Mochula OV; Maltseva AN; Suleymanova AS; Cygikalo AA; Ryabov VV; Zavadovsky KV
    Kardiologiia; 2023 Jun; 63(6):37-44. PubMed ID: 37470732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease.
    Sakuma H; Ishida M
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 21(1):195-211. PubMed ID: 34108304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease: Correlation with Angiographic Findings and Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements.
    Ben Bouallègue F; Roubille F; Lattuca B; Cung TT; Macia JC; Gervasoni R; Leclercq F; Mariano-Goulart D
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1712-7. PubMed ID: 26338893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based computed fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of myocardial ischemia verified by invasive FFR.
    Hu X; Yang M; Han L; Du Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1987-1996. PubMed ID: 30062537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Staged growth of optimized arterial model trees.
    Karch R; Neumann F; Neumann M; Schreiner W
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2000 May; 28(5):495-511. PubMed ID: 10925948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CT Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Hulten E; Ahmadi A; Blankstein R
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 25770850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Qualitative assessments of myocardial ischemia by cardiac MRI and coronary stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in relation to quantitative perfusion by positron emission tomography in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.
    Akil S; Hedeer F; Carlsson M; Arheden H; Oddstig J; Hindorf C; Jögi J; Erlinge D; Engblom H
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 30535919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Recent Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Comparative Study With 3-T Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Layland J; Rauhalammi S; Watkins S; Ahmed N; McClure J; Lee MM; Carrick D; O'Donnell A; Sood A; Petrie MC; May VT; Eteiba H; Lindsay M; McEntegart M; Oldroyd KG; Radjenovic A; Berry C
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(8):e002207. PubMed ID: 26253733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Global Coronary Flow Reserve Measured During Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Independent Predictor of Adverse Cardiovascular Events.
    Indorkar R; Kwong RY; Romano S; White BE; Chia RC; Trybula M; Evans K; Shenoy C; Farzaneh-Far A
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 2):1686-1695. PubMed ID: 30409558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sex Differences in Adenosine-Free Coronary Pressure Indexes: A CONTRAST Substudy.
    Shah SV; Zimmermann FM; Johnson NP; Nishi T; Kobayashi Y; Witt N; Berry C; Jeremias A; Koo BK; Esposito G; Rioufol G; Park SJ; Oldroyd KG; Barbato E; Pijls NHJ; De Bruyne B; Fearon WF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 11(15):1454-1463. PubMed ID: 30031722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multimodal Multiparametric Three-dimensional Image Fusion in Coronary Artery Disease: Combining the Best of Two Worlds.
    von Spiczak J; Mannil M; Model H; Schwemmer C; Kozerke S; Ruschitzka F; Alkadhi H; Manka R
    Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging; 2020 Apr; 2(2):e190116. PubMed ID: 33778554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Coronary arteries hemodynamics: effect of arterial geometry on hemodynamic parameters causing atherosclerosis.
    Wong KKL; Wu J; Liu G; Huang W; Ghista DN
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Aug; 58(8):1831-1843. PubMed ID: 32519006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simplified hybrid algorithms for pressure wire interrogation exploiting advantages of a baseline and contrast Pd/Pa ratio indexes to predict stenosis significance: Insight from the SPARE multicenter prospective study.
    Cerrato E; Tomassini F; Salinas P; Pavani M; Conrotto F; Echavarria-Pinto M; Macaya F; Quadri G; D'Ascenzo F; Quirós A; Varbella F; Escaned J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(6):1090-1096. PubMed ID: 29683558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Caruso D; Baumann S; Renker M; Mangold S; Dyer KT; Varga-Szemes A; Baquet M; Jochheim D; Ebersberger U; Bayer RR; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26993434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of contrast agent bolus dispersion in a coronary bifurcation: impact on MRI-based quantification of myocardial perfusion.
    Schmidt R; Graafen D; Weber S; Schreiber LM
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():513187. PubMed ID: 23533541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A simplified method to correct saturation of arterial input function for cardiac magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion imaging: validation with simultaneously acquired PET.
    Li R; Edalati M; Muccigrosso D; Lau JMC; Laforest R; Woodard PK; Zheng J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2023 Jun; 25(1):35. PubMed ID: 37344848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.