184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37629235)
1. Pre-Endoscopic Scores Predicting Low-Risk Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Boustany A; Alali AA; Almadi M; Martel M; Barkun AN
J Clin Med; 2023 Aug; 12(16):. PubMed ID: 37629235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Morarasu BC; Sorodoc V; Haisan A; Morarasu S; Bologa C; Haliga RE; Lionte C; Marciuc EA; Elsiddig M; Cimpoesu D; Dimofte GM; Sorodoc L
World J Clin Cases; 2023 Jul; 11(19):4513-4530. PubMed ID: 37469720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.
Martínez-Cara JG; Jiménez-Rosales R; Úbeda-Muñoz M; de Hierro ML; de Teresa J; Redondo-Cerezo E
United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Jun; 4(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 27403303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Oakland K; Kahan BC; Guizzetti L; Martel M; Bryant RV; Brahmania M; Singh S; Nguyen NQ; Sey MSL; Barkun A; Jairath V
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 17(6):1121-1129.e2. PubMed ID: 30268566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Chang A; Ouejiaraphant C; Akarapatima K; Rattanasupa A; Prachayakul V
Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
Tantai XX; Liu N; Yang LB; Wei ZC; Xiao CL; Song YH; Wang JH
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the Performance of the ABC, AIMS65, GBS, and pRS Scores in Predicting 90-day Mortality Or Rebleeding Among Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
Liu S; Zhang X; Walline JH; Yu X; Zhu H
J Transl Int Med; 2021 Jun; 9(2):114-122. PubMed ID: 34497750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.
Rivieri S; Carron PN; Schoepfer A; Ageron FX
Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparative Analysis of Risk Scoring Systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed.
Renukaprasad AK; Narayanaswamy S; R V
Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e26669. PubMed ID: 35949732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
