171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37631665)
1. Utilizing Drone-Based Ground-Penetrating Radar for Crime Investigations in Localizing and Identifying Clandestine Graves.
Lijcklama À Nijeholt L; Kronshorst TY; Teeffelen KV; van Manen B; Emaus R; Knotter J; Mersha A
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(16):. PubMed ID: 37631665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disturbances in the soil: finding buried bodies and other evidence using ground penetrating radar.
Miller PS
J Forensic Sci; 1996 Jul; 41(4):648-52. PubMed ID: 8754575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using electrical and ground-penetrating radar methods: 0-3 years after burial.
Pringle JK; Jervis JR; Hansen JD; Jones GM; Cassidy NJ; Cassella JP
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Nov; 57(6):1467-86. PubMed ID: 22509973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term Geophysical Monitoring of Simulated Clandestine Graves using Electrical and Ground Penetrating Radar Methods: 4-6 Years After Burial.
Pringle JK; Jervis JR; Roberts D; Dick HC; Wisniewski KD; Cassidy NJ; Cassella JP
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):309-321. PubMed ID: 27404604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monitoring of simulated clandestine graves of dismembered victims using UAVs, electrical tomography, and GPR over one year to aid investigations of human rights violations in Colombia, South America.
Molina CM; Wisniewski K; Heaton V; Pringle JK; Avila EF; Herrera LA; Guerrero J; Saumett M; Echeverry R; Duarte M; Baena A
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34927732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Geophysical imaging of buried human remains in simulated mass and single graves: Experiment design and results from pre-burial to six months after burial.
Doro KO; Kolapkar AM; Bank CG; Wescott DJ; Mickleburgh HL
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jun; 335():111289. PubMed ID: 35397358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishing forensic search methodologies and geophysical surveying for the detection of clandestine graves in coastal beach environments.
Pringle JK; Holland C; Szkornik K; Harrison M
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):e29-36. PubMed ID: 22285503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary results of sequential monitoring of simulated clandestine graves in Colombia, South America, using ground penetrating radar and botany.
Molina CM; Pringle JK; Saumett M; Hernández O
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Mar; 248():61-70. PubMed ID: 25596556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The utility of ground-penetrating radar and its time-dependence in the discovery of clandestine burials.
Salsarola D; Poppa P; Amadasi A; Mazzarelli D; Gibelli D; Zanotti E; Porta D; Cattaneo C
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Aug; 253():119-24. PubMed ID: 26119388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Drone aerial imagery for the simulation of a neonate burial based on the geoforensic search strategy (GSS).
Rocke B; Ruffell A; Donnelly L
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1506-1519. PubMed ID: 33576508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The suitability of using domestic pigs (Sus spp.) as human proxies in the geophysical detection of clandestine graves.
Berezowski V; Moffat I; Seckiner D; Crebert I; Ellis J; Mallett X
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):316-328. PubMed ID: 37904624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geophysical monitoring of simulated graves with resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, conductivity and GPR in Colombia, South America.
Molina CM; Pringle JK; Saumett M; Evans GT
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Apr; 261():106-15. PubMed ID: 26921813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Controlled GPR grave research: comparison of reflection profiles between 500 and 250 MHz antennae.
Schultz JJ; Martin MM
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):64-9. PubMed ID: 21237591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The detection of clandestine graves in an arid environment using thermal imaging deployed from an unmanned aerial vehicle.
Alawadhi A; Eliopoulos C; Bezombes F
J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1286-1291. PubMed ID: 37194428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time-lapse geophysical investigations over a simulated urban clandestine grave.
Pringle JK; Jervis J; Cassella JP; Cassidy NJ
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Nov; 53(6):1405-16. PubMed ID: 18808369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. UAV-assisted real-time evidence detection in outdoor crime scene investigations.
Georgiou A; Masters P; Johnson S; Feetham L
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1221-1232. PubMed ID: 35262192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential monitoring of burials containing small pig cadavers using ground penetrating radar.
Schultz JJ
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Mar; 53(2):279-87. PubMed ID: 18366561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monitoring of simulated clandestine graves of victims using UAVs, GPR, electrical tomography and conductivity over 4-8 years post-burial to aid forensic search investigators in Colombia, South America.
Molina CM; Wisniewski KD; Salamanca A; Saumett M; Rojas C; Gómez H; Baena A; Pringle JK
Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Feb; 355():111919. PubMed ID: 38218100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel approach to 3D modelling ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data - A case study of a cemetery and applications for criminal investigation.
Kelly TB; Angel MN; O'Connor DE; Huff CC; Morris LE; Wach GD
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110882. PubMed ID: 34182205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The application of low-altitude near-infrared aerial photography for detecting clandestine burials using a UAV and low-cost unmodified digital camera.
Evers R; Masters P
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():408-418. PubMed ID: 30025566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
