These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37632355)

  • 21. Technical note: Bayesian calibration of dynamic ruminant nutrition models.
    Reed KF; Arhonditsis GB; France J; Kebreab E
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6362-6370. PubMed ID: 27179874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cost-Effectiveness and Value-of-Information Analysis Using Machine Learning-Based Metamodeling: A Case of Hepatitis C Treatment.
    McCandlish JA; Ayer T; Chhatwal J
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Jan; 43(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 36113098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Metamodeling Approach for Instant Severity Assessment and Uncertainty Quantification of Iliac Artery Stenoses.
    Heinen SGH; Gashi K; van den Heuvel DAF; de Vries JPPM; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T; Huberts W
    J Biomech Eng; 2020 Jan; 142(1):. PubMed ID: 31513713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. r2ogs5: Calibration of Numerical Groundwater Flow Models with Bayesian Optimization in R.
    Schad P; Boog J; Kalbacher T
    Ground Water; 2023 Jan; 61(1):119-130. PubMed ID: 35729090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Bayesian approach for estimating calibration curves and unknown concentrations in immunoassays.
    Feng F; Sales AP; Kepler TB
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 27(5):707-12. PubMed ID: 21149344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Calibration of Cohorts of Virtual Patient Heart Models Using Bayesian History Matching.
    Rodero C; Longobardi S; Augustin C; Strocchi M; Plank G; Lamata P; Niederer SA
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jan; 51(1):241-252. PubMed ID: 36271218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bayesian calibration, process modeling and uncertainty quantification in biotechnology.
    Helleckes LM; Osthege M; Wiechert W; von Lieres E; Oldiges M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1009223. PubMed ID: 35255090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Toward a combined Bayesian frameworks to quantify parameter uncertainty in a large mountainous catchment with high spatial variability.
    Hassanzadeh Y; Afshar AA; Pourreza-Bilondi M; Memarian H; Besalatpour AA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Dec; 191(1):23. PubMed ID: 30569399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simulating the effects of localized red:far-red ratio on tillering in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) using a three-dimensional virtual plant model.
    Evers JB; Vos J; Chelle M; Andrieu B; Fournier C; Struik PC
    New Phytol; 2007; 176(2):325-336. PubMed ID: 17888114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A full-spectral Bayesian reconstruction approach based on the material decomposition model applied in dual-energy computed tomography.
    Cai C; Rodet T; Legoupil S; Mohammad-Djafari A
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111916. PubMed ID: 24320449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maintaining the long-term accuracy of water distribution models with data assimilation methods: A comparative study.
    Zhou X; Guo S; Xin K; Xu W; Tao T; Yan H
    Water Res; 2022 Nov; 226():119268. PubMed ID: 36302270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An adaptive information-theoretic experimental design procedure for high-to-low fidelity calibration of prostate cancer models.
    Cho H; Lewis AL; Storey KM; Zittle AC
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Sep; 20(10):17986-18017. PubMed ID: 38052545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A robust bayesian random effects model for nonlinear calibration problems.
    Fong Y; Wakefield J; De Rosa S; Frahm N
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1103-12. PubMed ID: 22551415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Comparison between Three Tuning Strategies for Gaussian Kernels in the Context of Univariate Genomic Prediction.
    Montesinos-López OA; Carter AH; Bernal-Sandoval DA; Cano-Paez B; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Dec; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 36553547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Dirichlet process mixture model for automatic (18)F-FDG PET image segmentation: Validation study on phantoms and on lung and esophageal lesions.
    Giri MG; Cavedon C; Mazzarotto R; Ferdeghini M
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2491. PubMed ID: 27147360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Uncertainty and spatial analysis in wheat yield prediction based on robust inclusive multiple models.
    Soroush F; Ehteram M; Seifi A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(8):20887-20906. PubMed ID: 36261636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automatic model calibration of combined hydrologic, hydraulic and stormwater quality models using approximate Bayesian computation.
    Chowdhury A; Egodawatta P
    Water Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 86(2):321-332. PubMed ID: 35906910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Uncertainty quantification, propagation and characterization by Bayesian analysis combined with global sensitivity analysis applied to dynamical intracellular pathway models.
    Eriksson O; Jauhiainen A; Maad Sasane S; Kramer A; Nair AG; Sartorius C; Hellgren Kotaleski J
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(2):284-292. PubMed ID: 30010712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bayesian-based calibration for water quality model parameters.
    Bai B; Dong F; Peng W; Liu X
    Water Environ Res; 2023 Oct; 95(10):e10936. PubMed ID: 37807852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computational Intelligence and Wavelet Transform Based Metamodel for Efficient Generation of Not-Yet Simulated Waveforms.
    Oltean G; Ivanciu LN
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146602. PubMed ID: 26745370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.