These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3763365)

  • 1. On the detection of letters within redundant arrays.
    Johnson NF
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Aug; 40(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 3763365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facilitation and interference with a separable redundant dimension in stimulus comparison.
    Garner WR
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Oct; 44(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 3226879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of lowercase letters in peripheral vision: a discrimination matrix based on saccade latencies.
    Jacobs AM; Nazir TA; Heller O
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 2755768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets.
    Fournier LR; Eriksen CW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):538-50. PubMed ID: 2144569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Target-distractor discriminability in visual search.
    Pashler H
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Apr; 41(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 3588236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image.
    Kinchla RA; Solis-Macias V; Hoffman J
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Jan; 33(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6844087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is time to scan visual images due to demand characteristics?
    Jolicoeur P; Kosslyn SM
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Jul; 13(4):320-32. PubMed ID: 4079748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physical and name match processes in same-different judgments for letters.
    Kirsner K; Wells JE; Sang DL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1982 Nov; 52(1-2):73-85. PubMed ID: 7164849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task.
    Harms L; Bundesen C
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Jan; 33(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 6844088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More rapid visual identification rate in search of a missing stimulus.
    Inamori Y; Inamori R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):570. PubMed ID: 2342858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual search and stimulus similarity.
    Duncan J; Humphreys GW
    Psychol Rev; 1989 Jul; 96(3):433-58. PubMed ID: 2756067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison processes on visual mental images.
    Bagnara S; Simion F; Tagliabue ME; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 1988 Mar; 16(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 3352519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing redundant signals: coactivation, divided attention, or what?
    Eriksen CW; Goettl B; St James JD; Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 2710636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: an attentional range effect.
    LaBerge D; Brown V
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Sep; 40(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 3774503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetry in human discrimination learning: feature positive effect or focus of hypothesis effect?
    Fiedler K; Eckert C; Poysiak C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1989 Mar; 70(2):109-27. PubMed ID: 2741708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual letter-matching and the time course of visual and acoustic codes.
    Carrasco M; Kinchla RA; Figueroa JG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1988 Oct; 69(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 3245474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of associative and perceptual interference.
    Grice GR; Canham L; Schafer C
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Oct; 32(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 7155783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Null effects of exposure duration and heterogeneity of difference on the same-different disparity in letter matching.
    Proctor RW; Rao KV
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Feb; 33(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 6844107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Same-different judgments under high speed stress: missing-feature principle predominates in early processing.
    Krueger LE; Chignell MH
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Aug; 38(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 4088809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A two-term exponential functional description of the time course of sustained attention.
    Giambra LM; Quilter RE
    Hum Factors; 1987 Dec; 29(6):635-43. PubMed ID: 3436620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.