These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37633712)

  • 1. Added value of neurotechnology for forensic psychiatric and psychological assessment.
    Kempes M
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2023; 197():217-232. PubMed ID: 37633712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Forensic psychiatry in the era of neuroscience: present status and outlook for neurobiological research].
    Müller JL
    Nervenarzt; 2009 Mar; 80(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 19011828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between comorbidity and violence risk assessment in forensic psychiatry - the implication of neuroimaging studies.
    Palijan TZ; Radeljak S; Kovac M; Kovacević D
    Psychiatr Danub; 2010 Jun; 22(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 20562756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neuroprediction and A.I. in Forensic Psychiatry and Criminal Justice: A Neurolaw Perspective.
    Tortora L; Meynen G; Bijlsma J; Tronci E; Ferracuti S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():220. PubMed ID: 32256422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The importance of neuropsychological assessment for forensic psychiatric evaluations of defendants].
    Schouws SN; Jonker C; Meynen G
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2016; 58(12):872-880. PubMed ID: 27976785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forensic psychiatry and neurolaw: Description, developments, and debates.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 65():101345. PubMed ID: 29724513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Criminal behavior in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease].
    Haußmann R; Krug C; Noppes F; Brandt M; Lange J; Donix M
    Nervenarzt; 2022 Jan; 93(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 33575835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments.
    Gkotsi GM; Gasser J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():58-67. PubMed ID: 27209602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
    Konrad N; Völlm B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forensic mental health assessment in France: recommendations for quality improvement.
    Combalbert N; Andronikof A; Armand M; Robin C; Bazex H
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 24631526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of an additive informal social network intervention for forensic psychiatric outpatients: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Swinkels LTA; van der Pol TM; Twisk J; Ter Harmsel JF; Dekker JJM; Popma A
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1129492. PubMed ID: 37293397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on forensic psychiatry: Evidence based assessment and treatment of mentally disordered offenders.
    Völlm BA; Clarke M; Herrando VT; Seppänen AO; Gosek P; Heitzman J; Bulten E
    Eur Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 51():58-73. PubMed ID: 29571072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forensic psychology and correctional psychology: Distinct but related subfields of psychological science and practice.
    Neal TMS
    Am Psychol; 2018; 73(5):651-662. PubMed ID: 29431456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neurobiological correlates in forensic assessment: a systematic review.
    van der Gronde T; Kempes M; van El C; Rinne T; Pieters T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110672. PubMed ID: 25330208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forensic Brain-Reading and Mental Privacy in European Human Rights Law: Foundations and Challenges.
    Ligthart S; Douglas T; Bublitz C; Kooijmans T; Meynen G
    Neuroethics; 2021 Jul; 14():191-203. PubMed ID: 35186162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Neuropsychological Assessment of Justice-Involved Men: Descriptive Analysis, Preliminary Data, and a Case for Group-Specific Norms.
    LaDuke C; DeMatteo D; Heilbrun K; Gallo J; Swirsky-Sacchetti T
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Dec; 32(8):929-942. PubMed ID: 28520974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors related to bias in forensic psychiatric assessments in criminal matters: A systematic review.
    Meyer LF; Valença AM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 75():101681. PubMed ID: 33712325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.