These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37633731)
1. Digital mounting accuracy of 2 intraoral scanners with a single anterior or bilateral posterior occlusal scan: A three-dimensional analysis. Cha C; Pyo SW; Chang JS; Kim S J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):612.e1-612.e8. PubMed ID: 37633731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study. Diker B; Tak Ö J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces. Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104414. PubMed ID: 36640842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of mandibular partial edentulous distal extension on virtual occlusal record accuracy when using two different intraoral scanners: An in vitro analysis. Tian J; Jung RE; Han Y; Mei Y; Di P J Dent; 2024 Nov; 150():105303. PubMed ID: 39134116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner. Revilla-León M; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison. Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete arch digital scan, part 2: A comparison of scan strategies. Son K; Jin MU; Lee KB J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):341-349. PubMed ID: 34172264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study. Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation and comparison of the accuracy of three intraoral scanners for replicating a complete denture. Le Texier L; Nicolas E; Batisse C J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):706.e1-706.e8. PubMed ID: 38310062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship. Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Yilmaz B; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners. Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Different Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Bite Registration in Edentulous Maxillary and Mandibular Arches. Rutkūnas V; Jegelevičius D; Gedrimienė A; Auškalnis L; Eyüboğlu TF; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Akulauskas M; Pletkus J J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105050. PubMed ID: 38735468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations. Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of different complete coverage onlay preparation designs and the intraoral scanner on the accuracy of digital scans. de Andrade GS; Luz JN; Tribst JPM; Chun EP; Bressane A; Borges ALS; Saavedra GSFA J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1168-1177. PubMed ID: 35717209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of repeatability of different alignment methods to obtain digital interocclusal records: An in vitro study. Garikano X; Amezua X; Iturrate M; Solaberrieta E J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):709-717. PubMed ID: 36115710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Elter B; Tak Ö J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104729. PubMed ID: 37778497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans. Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques. Iwauchi Y; Tanaka S; Kamimura-Sugimura E; Baba K J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 33775391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]