144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37633809)
1. Applicant Experience in Communication With Residency Programs After the Introduction of Program Signaling.
Schoppen Z; Morgan HK; Hammoud M; Marzano D; George K; Winkel AF
J Surg Educ; 2023 Dec; 80(12):1762-1772. PubMed ID: 37633809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current Communication Practices Between Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applicants and Program Directors.
Morgan HK; Winkel AF; George K; Strand E; Banks E; Byrne F; Marzano D; Hammoud MM
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Oct; 5(10):e2238655. PubMed ID: 36287561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The golden tickets: impact of preference signaling on obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants.
Cai F; Southworth E; Santiago S; Stephenson-Famy A; Fay E; Wang EY; Burns RN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 230(2):262.e1-262.e9. PubMed ID: 37839590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications in the Year After Abortion Access Changes.
Hammoud MM; Morgan HK; George K; Ollendorff AT; Dalrymple JL; Dunleavy D; Zhu M; Banks E; Akingbola BA; Connolly A
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2355017. PubMed ID: 38324311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mixed Signals: Navigating the Obstetrics and Gynecology Signaling Initiative.
Kraus AC; Dalrymple JL; Schwartz E; Marzan G; Nelson S; Morgan HK; Hammoud MM; Young OM
J Surg Educ; 2024 Apr; 81(4):525-534. PubMed ID: 38413356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postinterview communication with residency applicants: a call for clarity!
Frishman GN; Matteson KA; Bienstock JL; George KE; Ogburn T; Rauk PN; Schnatz PF; Learman LA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 211(4):344-350.e1. PubMed ID: 25068562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Away Rotations in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Survey of Program Directors.
George KE; Litman EA; Banks E; Morgan HK; Hammoud MM; Strand E
J Surg Educ; 2023 Sep; 80(9):1340-1349. PubMed ID: 37442695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perspectives of Stakeholders About an Early Result Acceptance Program to Complement the Residency Match in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Winkel AF; Morgan HK; Akingbola O; Santos-Parker K; Nelson E; Banks E; Katz NT; Bienstock JL; Marzano D; Hammoud MM
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2124158. PubMed ID: 34633427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Relationship Between Program and Applicant Characteristics With Applicant Program Signals in the 2022 Residency Recruitment Cycle: Findings From 3 Specialties.
LaFemina J; Rosman IS; Wallach SL; Wise PE; Smink DS; Fletcher L
Acad Med; 2024 Apr; 99(4):430-436. PubMed ID: 38113444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Obstetrics and gynecology applicant perceptions of residency program culture with virtual interviews: a qualitative analysis of social media posts.
Jacques LH; Cowley ES; Hebgen SM; Spencer RJ; Hale CM
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Mar; 24(1):252. PubMed ID: 38459487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How Did Coronavirus-19 Impact the Expenses for Medical Students Applying to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency in 2020 to 2021?
Gordon AM; Conway CA; Sheth BK; Magruder ML; Vakharia RM; Levine WN; Razi AE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):443-451. PubMed ID: 34913886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How We Do It: Student Perspectives on Changes to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Application Process.
Strand EA; Worly BL; Morgan HK; Marzano DA; Winkel AF; Bienstock J; Banks E; Katz NT; Brito LGO; Hammoud MM
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(5):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 35525780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does "Hoarding" Impact Interview Distribution Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants? A Modeling Study Based on a Large Database.
Hutchison CE; Reminick JI; Love ER; Karan S; Gundle KR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 481(10):1870-1877. PubMed ID: 37638857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Program Signaling in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications.
Banks E; Winkel AF; Morgan HK; Connolly A; Hammoud MM; George KE
Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 143(2):281-283. PubMed ID: 38033322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distributions of Residency Interviews With the Implementation of Virtual Interviews and Standardization of Interview Offer Dates.
Santos-Parker KS; Hammoud MM; Winkel AF; Marzano D; Frank S; Franz P; Morgan HK
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(5):1105-1112. PubMed ID: 35477525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stakeholder Perspectives on Limiting Residency Applications and Interviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Strand EA; Winkel AF; Marzano DA; Morgan HK; Staples H; Hammoud MM
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(2):362-369. PubMed ID: 34862152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of virtual interviewing on applicant approach to and perspective of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Match.
Lewkowitz AK; Ramsey PS; Burrell D; Metz TD; Rhoades JS
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 May; 3(3):100326. PubMed ID: 33548511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Underrepresented Minorities are Underrepresented Among General Surgery Applicants Selected to Interview.
Jarman BT; Kallies KJ; Joshi ART; Smink DS; Sarosi GA; Chang L; Green JM; Greenberg JA; Melcher ML; Nfonsam V; Ramirez LD; Borgert AJ; Whiting J
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(6):e15-e23. PubMed ID: 31175064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stakeholder Perspectives on Standardizing the Residency Application and Interview Processes.
Hammoud MM; Winkel AF; Strand EA; Worly BL; Marzano DA; Bronner BA; Forstein DA; Katz NT; Woodland MB; Morgan HK
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(4):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 33199253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.
Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
