117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37634439)
21. Characteristics and prognosis of interval cancers after biennial screen-film or full-field digital screening mammography.
Weber RJ; van Bommel RM; Louwman MW; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Duijm LE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 158(3):471-83. PubMed ID: 27393617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with False-Positive Results according to Mammographic Features.
Castells X; Torá-Rocamora I; Posso M; Román M; Vernet-Tomas M; Rodríguez-Arana A; Domingo L; Vidal C; Baré M; Ferrer J; Quintana MJ; Sánchez M; Natal C; Espinàs JA; Saladié F; Sala M;
Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 26878225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.
Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.
Lång K; Josefsson V; Larsson AM; Larsson S; Högberg C; Sartor H; Hofvind S; Andersson I; Rosso A
Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):936-944. PubMed ID: 37541274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Do mammographic tumor features in breast cancer relate to breast density and invasiveness, tumor size, and axillary lymph node involvement?
Sartor H; Borgquist S; Hartman L; Olsson Å; Jawdat F; Zackrisson S
Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):536-44. PubMed ID: 24814360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Interest of individual breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged over 75 years].
Pelofi G; Martin X; Barben J; Jouanny P
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil; 2022 Jun; 20(2):182-189. PubMed ID: 35929385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Incidence and tumour characteristics of bilateral and unilateral interval breast cancers at screening mammography.
van Bommel RMG; Voogd AC; Nederend J; Setz-Pels W; Louwman MWJ; Strobbe LJ; Venderink D; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():101-106. PubMed ID: 29306176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Early detection of breast cancer through population-based mammographic screening in Asian women: a comparison study between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.
Chuwa EW; Yeo AW; Koong HN; Wong CY; Yong WS; Tan PH; Ho JT; Wong JS; Ho GH
Breast J; 2009; 15(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 19292798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinicopathological differences between interval and screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed within a screening programme in Northern Portugal.
José Bento M; Gonçalves G; Aguiar A; Antunes L; Veloso V; Rodrigues V
J Med Screen; 2014 Jun; 21(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 24803482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Frequency and diagnostic outcome of bilateral recall at screening mammography.
Lameijer JRC; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 32621785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with ipsilateral breast carcinoma: the role of mammography.
Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Padungchaichote W; Chaiwun B
Singapore Med J; 2002 May; 43(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12188073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
Hovda T; Brandal SHB; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Bjørndal H; Skaane P; Hofvind S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6991-6999. PubMed ID: 31187221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mammographic and clinical characteristics of different phenotypes of screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a nationwide screening program.
Baré M; Torà N; Salas D; Sentís M; Ferrer J; Ibáñez J; Zubizarreta R; Sarriugarte G; Barata T; Domingo L; Castells X; Sala M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(2):403-15. PubMed ID: 26531756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by screening mammography in Taiwan: a single institute's experience.
Han HJ; Chu YC; Wang J; Lai YC; Tseng LM; Huang CC
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):330. PubMed ID: 37344800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mammographic features of benign breast lesions and risk of subsequent breast cancer in women attending breast cancer screening.
Posso M; Alcántara R; Vázquez I; Comerma L; Baré M; Louro J; Quintana MJ; Román M; Marcos-Gragera R; Vernet-Tomas M; Saladie F; Vidal C; Bargalló X; Peñalva L; Sala M; Castells X;
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):621-629. PubMed ID: 34156554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Screen-detected breast cancer compared to symptomatic presentation: an analysis of surgical treatment and end-points of effective mammographic screening.
Spillane AJ; Kennedy CW; Gillett DJ; Carmalt HL; Janu NC; Rickard MT; Donnellan MJ
ANZ J Surg; 2001 Jul; 71(7):398-402. PubMed ID: 11450913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MRI versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women with familial risk (FaMRIsc): a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Saadatmand S; Geuzinge HA; Rutgers EJT; Mann RM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Zonderland HM; Tollenaar RAEM; Lobbes MBI; Ausems MGEM; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Mares-Engelberts I; Luiten EJT; Heijnsdijk EAM; Verhoef C; Karssemeijer N; Oosterwijk JC; Obdeijn IM; de Koning HJ; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA;
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Aug; 20(8):1136-1147. PubMed ID: 31221620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mammographic surveillance in women younger than 50 years who have a family history of breast cancer: tumour characteristics and projected effect on mortality in the prospective, single-arm, FH01 study.
FH01 collaborative teams
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1127-34. PubMed ID: 21093374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
