These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37635350)

  • 61. UK reporting radiographers' perceptions of AI in radiographic image interpretation - Current perspectives and future developments.
    Rainey C; O'Regan T; Matthew J; Skelton E; Woznitza N; Chu KY; Goodman S; McConnell J; Hughes C; Bond R; Malamateniou C; McFadden S
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Nov; 28(4):881-888. PubMed ID: 35780627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Reporting radiographers in Norway - A qualitative interview study.
    Berntsen A; Myklebust AM; Kjelle E
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 Mar; 29(2):450-455. PubMed ID: 36812792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Reject rate analysis in digital radiography: an Australian emergency imaging department case study.
    Atkinson S; Neep M; Starkey D
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Mar; 67(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 31318181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.
    Taylor A; Staruchowicz L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(42 Suppl):1-22. PubMed ID: 27820153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparing the performance of trained radiographers against experienced radiologists in the UK lung cancer screening (UKLS) trial.
    Nair A; Gartland N; Barton B; Jones D; Clements L; Screaton NJ; Holemans JA; Duffy SW; Field JK; Baldwin DR; Hansell DM; Devaraj A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160301. PubMed ID: 27461068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Understanding reasons for image rejection by radiologists and radiographers.
    Decoster R; Toomey R; Smits D; Haygood TM; Ryan ML
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2023 Jun; 70(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 36565472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The 'radiographer-referrer game': image interpretation dynamics in rural practice.
    Squibb K; Smith A; Dalton L; Bull RM
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2016 Mar; 63(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 27087971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A longitudinal review of Scottish reporting radiographer output between 2015 and 2019.
    McConnell J
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):200-207. PubMed ID: 32819823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Determining the Need for After-Hours Diagnostic Radiological Reporting in Emergency Departments at Public Hospitals in South Africa: Perceptions of Emergency Physicians in KwaZulu-Natal.
    Chetty S; Venter D; Speelman A
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 51(3):470-479. PubMed ID: 32654979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Care of transgender patients by diagnostic radiographers: What can be learnt from the literature.
    Hammond C; Lockwood P
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):145-150. PubMed ID: 38035425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Radiographer workforce role expansion to improve patient safety related to nasogastric tube placement for feeding in adults.
    Roe G; Harris KM; Lambie H; Tolan DJM
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jun; 72(6):518.e1-518.e7. PubMed ID: 28237300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. To keep or reject, that is the question - A survey on radiologists and radiographers' assessments of plain radiography images.
    Kjelle E; Schanche AK; Hafskjold L
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):115-119. PubMed ID: 32682730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. An investigation into the use of radiographer abnormality detection systems by Queensland public hospitals.
    Murphy A; Neep M
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2018 Jun; 65(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 29707911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Radiographer reporting: A literature review to support cancer workforce planning in England.
    Culpan G; Culpan AM; Docherty P; Denton E
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 May; 25(2):155-163. PubMed ID: 30955689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Accuracy of radiographer preliminary clinical evaluation of skeletal trauma radiographs, in clinical practice at a district general hospital.
    Verrier W; Pittock LJ; Bodoceanu M; Piper K
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):312-318. PubMed ID: 35012880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Statement of the German Roentgen Society, German Society of Neuroradiology, and Society of German-speaking Pediatric Radiologists on Requirements for the Performance and Reporting of MR Imaging Examinations Outside of Radiology.
    Hunold P; Bucher AM; Sandstede J; Janka R; Fritz LB; Regier M; Loose R; Barkhausen J; Mentzel HJ; Zimmer C; Antoch G; ; ;
    Rofo; 2021 Sep; 193(9):1050-1061. PubMed ID: 33831956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Improving the delivery of health care to patients: radiographers and frontline image interpretation.
    Baird M
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2018 Mar; 65(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 29528200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Accuracy of appendicular radiographic image interpretation by radiographers and junior doctors in Ghana: Can this be improved by training?
    Ofori-Manteaw BB; Dzidzornu E
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Aug; 25(3):255-259. PubMed ID: 31301784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Interpretation of trauma radiographs by radiographers and nurses in the UK: a comparative study.
    Hardy M; Barrett C
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):657-61. PubMed ID: 15326043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Assessment of the Willingness of Radiologists and Radiographers to Accept the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Radiology Practice.
    Abuzaid MM; Elshami W; Tekin H; Issa B
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 33129659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.