These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37635446)

  • 1. Appropriate handling and storage reduce the risk of bacterial growth in enteral feeding systems reused within 24 hours.
    Hubbard GP; Van Wyk J; Grinyer L; Onley R; White S; Fleming CA; Baxter J; Forwood L; Stratton RJ
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2024 Apr; 39(2):437-449. PubMed ID: 37635446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of system design on bacterial contamination of enteral tube feeds.
    McKinlay J; Wildgoose A; Wood W; Gould IM; Anderton A
    J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 11170778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enteral Feeding Set Handling Techniques.
    Lyman B; Williams M; Sollazzo J; Hayden A; Hensley P; Dai H; Roberts C
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 32(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 28362574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enteral Feeding Set Handling Techniques: A Comparison of Bacterial Growth, Nursing Time, Labor, and Material Costs.
    Lyman B; Williams M; Sollazzo J; Hayden A; Hensley P; Dai H; Roberts C
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 32(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 29927527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbiological evaluation of four enteral feeding systems which have been deliberately subjected to faulty handling procedures.
    Beattie TK; Anderton A
    J Hosp Infect; 1999 May; 42(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 10363206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of sites of bacterial contamination in an enteral feeding system.
    Mathus-Vliegen EM; Bredius MW; Binnekade JM
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2006; 30(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 17047178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a closed enteral feeding system under cyclic feeding conditions: a microbial and cost evaluation.
    Moffitt SK; Gohman SM; Sass KM; Faucher KJ
    Nutrition; 1997; 13(7-8):622-8. PubMed ID: 9263253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bacteriological safety of closed enteral nutrition delivery system.
    Curtas S; Forbes B; Meguid V; Meguid MM
    Nutrition; 1991; 7(5):340-3. PubMed ID: 1804469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of high ambient temperature on contamination and physical stability of one-liter ready-to-hang enteral delivery systems.
    Hsu TC; Chen NR; Sullivan MM; Kohn-Keeth CL; Meints AS; Shott S; Comer GM
    Nutrition; 2000 Mar; 16(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 10705069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contamination of gastrostomy feeding systems in children in a home-based enteral nutrition program.
    Bott L; Husson MO; Guimber D; Michaud L; Arnaud-Battandier F; Turck D; Gottrand F
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2001 Sep; 33(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 11593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enteral tube feeding and infection control: how safe is our practice?
    Best C
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Sep 11-24; 17(16):1036, 1038-41. PubMed ID: 19062456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decanting versus sterile pre-filled nutrient containers--the microbiological risks in enteral feeding.
    Beattie TK; Anderton A
    Int J Environ Health Res; 2001 Mar; 11(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 11260790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controlling bacterial contamination of an enteral formula through the use of a unique closed system: contamination, enteral formulas, closed system.
    Dentinger B; Faucher KJ; Ostrom SM; Schmidl MK
    Nutrition; 1995; 11(6):747-50. PubMed ID: 8719133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the risk of contamination of enteral nutrition bottles based on the simulation of home use conditions and hygiene procedures.
    da Silva ITF; Medeiros CO; Leobet J; Beux MR; Rabito EI; Etgeton SAP; Fiori LS
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2024 Aug; 39(4):873-880. PubMed ID: 38491970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrograde (ascending) bacterial contamination of enteral diet administration systems.
    Payne-James JJ; Rana SK; Bray MJ; McSwiggan DA; Silk DB
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1992; 16(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 1640636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the bacteriological contamination of a closed feeding system for enteral nutrition.
    Chan L; Yasmin AH; Ngeow YF; Ong GS
    Med J Malaysia; 1994 Mar; 49(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 8057993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accepted Safe Food-Handling Procedures Minimizes Microbial Contamination of Home-Prepared Blenderized Tube-Feeding.
    Milton DL; Johnson TW; Johnson K; Murphy B; Carter H; Hurt RT; Mundi MS; Epp L; Spurlock AY; Hussey J
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2020 Jun; 35(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 31997383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bacterial contamination of ready-to-use 1-L feeding bottles and administration sets in severely compromised intensive care patients.
    Mathus-Vliegen LM; Binnekade JM; de Haan RJ
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Jan; 28(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10667501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limiting bacterial contamination of enteral nutrient solutions: 6-year history with reduction of contamination at two institutions.
    Fagerman KE
    Nutr Clin Pract; 1992 Feb; 7(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 1293501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.