124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37635446)
1. Appropriate handling and storage reduce the risk of bacterial growth in enteral feeding systems reused within 24 hours.
Hubbard GP; Van Wyk J; Grinyer L; Onley R; White S; Fleming CA; Baxter J; Forwood L; Stratton RJ
Nutr Clin Pract; 2024 Apr; 39(2):437-449. PubMed ID: 37635446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of system design on bacterial contamination of enteral tube feeds.
McKinlay J; Wildgoose A; Wood W; Gould IM; Anderton A
J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 11170778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the risk of contamination of enteral nutrition bottles based on the simulation of home use conditions and hygiene procedures.
da Silva ITF; Medeiros CO; Leobet J; Beux MR; Rabito EI; Etgeton SAP; Fiori LS
Nutr Clin Pract; 2024 Aug; 39(4):873-880. PubMed ID: 38491970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microbiological evaluation of four enteral feeding systems which have been deliberately subjected to faulty handling procedures.
Beattie TK; Anderton A
J Hosp Infect; 1999 May; 42(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 10363206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of high ambient temperature on contamination and physical stability of one-liter ready-to-hang enteral delivery systems.
Hsu TC; Chen NR; Sullivan MM; Kohn-Keeth CL; Meints AS; Shott S; Comer GM
Nutrition; 2000 Mar; 16(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 10705069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enteral Feeding Set Handling Techniques: A Comparison of Bacterial Growth, Nursing Time, Labor, and Material Costs.
Lyman B; Williams M; Sollazzo J; Hayden A; Hensley P; Dai H; Roberts C
Nutr Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 32(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 29927527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bacteriological safety of closed enteral nutrition delivery system.
Curtas S; Forbes B; Meguid V; Meguid MM
Nutrition; 1991; 7(5):340-3. PubMed ID: 1804469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enteral Feeding Set Handling Techniques.
Lyman B; Williams M; Sollazzo J; Hayden A; Hensley P; Dai H; Roberts C
Nutr Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 32(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 28362574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decanting versus sterile pre-filled nutrient containers--the microbiological risks in enteral feeding.
Beattie TK; Anderton A
Int J Environ Health Res; 2001 Mar; 11(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 11260790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of sites of bacterial contamination in an enteral feeding system.
Mathus-Vliegen EM; Bredius MW; Binnekade JM
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2006; 30(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 17047178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a closed enteral feeding system under cyclic feeding conditions: a microbial and cost evaluation.
Moffitt SK; Gohman SM; Sass KM; Faucher KJ
Nutrition; 1997; 13(7-8):622-8. PubMed ID: 9263253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal hang time of enteral formula at standard room temperature and high temperature.
Lakananurak N; Nalinthassanai N; Suansawang W; Panarat P
World J Clin Cases; 2020 Oct; 8(19):4410-4415. PubMed ID: 33083400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-admission functional status impacts the performance of the APACHE IV model of mortality prediction in critically ill patients.
Krinsley JS; Wasser T; Kang G; Bagshaw SM
Crit Care; 2017 May; 21(1):110. PubMed ID: 28506290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlling bacterial contamination of an enteral formula through the use of a unique closed system: contamination, enteral formulas, closed system.
Dentinger B; Faucher KJ; Ostrom SM; Schmidl MK
Nutrition; 1995; 11(6):747-50. PubMed ID: 8719133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrograde (ascending) bacterial contamination of enteral diet administration systems.
Payne-James JJ; Rana SK; Bray MJ; McSwiggan DA; Silk DB
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1992; 16(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 1640636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bacterial contamination of ready-to-use 1-L feeding bottles and administration sets in severely compromised intensive care patients.
Mathus-Vliegen LM; Binnekade JM; de Haan RJ
Crit Care Med; 2000 Jan; 28(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10667501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limiting bacterial contamination of enteral nutrient solutions: 6-year history with reduction of contamination at two institutions.
Fagerman KE
Nutr Clin Pract; 1992 Feb; 7(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 1293501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contamination of gastrostomy feeding systems in children in a home-based enteral nutrition program.
Bott L; Husson MO; Guimber D; Michaud L; Arnaud-Battandier F; Turck D; Gottrand F
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2001 Sep; 33(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 11593120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microbial contamination of enteral feeding products in thermoneutral and hyperthermal ICU environments.
Perry J; Stankorb SM; Salgueiro M
Nutr Clin Pract; 2015 Feb; 30(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25118176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accepted Safe Food-Handling Procedures Minimizes Microbial Contamination of Home-Prepared Blenderized Tube-Feeding.
Milton DL; Johnson TW; Johnson K; Murphy B; Carter H; Hurt RT; Mundi MS; Epp L; Spurlock AY; Hussey J
Nutr Clin Pract; 2020 Jun; 35(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 31997383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
