157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37637899)
21. Questioning the Role of Forward Associative Strength in False Memories: Evidence From Deese-Roediger-McDermott Lists With Three Critical Lures.
Beato MS; Arndt J
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():724594. PubMed ID: 34589029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. False memory in a short-term memory task.
Coane JH; McBride DM; Raulerson BA; Jordan JS
Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 17341016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Thinking of critical words during study is unnecessary for false memory in the Deese, Roediger, and McDermott procedure.
Seamon JG; Lee IA; Toner SK; Wheeler RH; Goodkind MS; Birch AD
Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):526-31. PubMed ID: 12430836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The mnemonic effects of insight on false memory in the DRM paradigm.
Du X; Cui C; Hu Z; Zhang K; Song Y
Psychol Res; 2022 Mar; 86(2):558-570. PubMed ID: 33844066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception.
Toglia MP; Schmuller J; Surprenant BG; Hooper KC; DeMeo NN; Wallace BL
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():721961. PubMed ID: 35386904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of attention at retrieval on the false recognition of negative emotional DRM lists.
Shah D; Knott LM
Memory; 2018 Feb; 26(2):269-276. PubMed ID: 28718338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transcranial direct current stimulation over the left anterior temporal lobe during memory retrieval differentially affects true and false recognition in the DRM task.
Friehs MA; Greene C; Pastötter B
Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 54(2):4609-4620. PubMed ID: 34076917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Modality effect in false recognition: evidence from Chinese characters.
Mao WB; Yang ZL; Wang LS
Int J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 22043843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Encoding strategy affects false recall and recognition: Evidence from categorical study material.
Olszewska J; Ulatowska J
Adv Cogn Psychol; 2013; 9(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 23717349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Priming and false memories from Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists on a fragment completion test with children.
Diliberto-Macaluso KA
Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 15822608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of early list manipulations on the DRM illusion.
Fam J; Huff MJ; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Nov; 74(11):1924-1934. PubMed ID: 33840269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. True and False DRM Memories: Differences Detected with an Implicit Task.
Marini M; Agosta S; Mazzoni G; Barba GD; Sartori G
Front Psychol; 2012; 3():310. PubMed ID: 22969740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Awareness of the false memory manipulation and false recall for people's names as critical lures in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Mukai A
Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Oct; 101(2):546-60. PubMed ID: 16383092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Post-learning arousal enhances veridical memory and reduces false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Nielson KA; Correro AN
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Oct; 144():198-207. PubMed ID: 28756031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Test-item sequence affects false memory formation: an event-related potential study.
Chen JC; Li W; Westerberg CE; Tzeng OJ
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 431(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 18155357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of increasing semantic-associate list length on the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false recognition memory: Dual false-memory process in retrieval from sub- and supraspan lists.
Jou J; Arredondo ML; Li C; Escamilla EE; Zuniga R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2076-2093. PubMed ID: 27606720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of rehearsal and generation in false memory creation.
Marsh EJ; Bower GH
Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):748-61. PubMed ID: 15724363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using the DRM paradigm to assess language processing in monolinguals and bilinguals.
Bialystok E; Dey A; Sullivan MD; Sommers MS
Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):870-883. PubMed ID: 31975029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mood impedes monitoring of emotional false memories: evidence for the associative theories.
Zhang W; Gross J; Hayne H
Memory; 2019 Feb; 27(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 30001179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. False memory and level of processing effect: an event-related potential study.
Beato MS; Boldini A; Cadavid S
Neuroreport; 2012 Sep; 23(13):804-8. PubMed ID: 22811058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
