138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37639329)
1. Model observer performance in contrast-enhanced lesions in breast CT: The influence of contrast concentration on detectability.
Lyu SH; Hernandez AM; Shakeri SA; Abbey CK; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):6748-6761. PubMed ID: 37639329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pre-whitened matched filter and convolutional neural network based model observer performance for mass lesion detection in non-contrast breast CT.
Lyu SH; Abbey CK; Hernandez AM; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7558-7567. PubMed ID: 37646463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions.
Packard NJ; Abbey CK; Yang K; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1818-30. PubMed ID: 22482604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microcalcification detectability in breast CT images using CNN observers.
Lyu SH; Abbey CK; Hernandez AM; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):933-945. PubMed ID: 38154070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.
Chen L; Boone JM; Abbey CK; Hargreaves J; Bateni C; Lindfors KK; Yang K; Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Gazi P
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3347-58. PubMed ID: 25825980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of compressed breast thickness and dose on lesion detectability in digital mammography: FROC study with simulated lesions in real mammograms.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Michielsen K; Cockmartin L; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5104. PubMed ID: 27587041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities.
Chen L; Abbey CK; Boone JM
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Mar; 58(6):1663-81. PubMed ID: 23422272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Numerical observer study of lesion detection.
Raylman RR; Stolin A; Hays S; Johnson E; Lankas S; Mekonnen M; Roemer K
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7489-7496. PubMed ID: 36219487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model.
Hu YH; Scaduto DA; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 28044312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam CT: evaluation by 2AFC tests in relation to physical performance metrics.
Tward DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Daly MJ; Richard S; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Paul NS
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4459-71. PubMed ID: 18072510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimentally determined spectral optimization for dedicated breast computed tomography.
Prionas ND; Huang SY; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):646-55. PubMed ID: 21452702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of low-contrast detectability in thin-collimated modern multidetector CT using an interactive sliding-thin-slab averaging algorithm.
von Falck C; Hartung A; Berndzen F; King B; Galanski M; Shin HO
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 18340246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of anatomical noise on the detectability of cone beam CT images with different slice direction, slice thickness, and volume glandular fraction.
Han M; Park S; Baek J
Opt Express; 2016 Aug; 24(17):18843-59. PubMed ID: 27557168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of kV, filtration, dose, and object size on soft tissue and iodine contrast in dedicated breast CT.
Hernandez AM; Abbey CK; Ghazi P; Burkett G; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 32233091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.
Leng S; Yu L; Zhang Y; Carter R; Toledano AY; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081908. PubMed ID: 23927322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep learning for x-ray scatter correction in dedicated breast CT.
Pautasso JJ; Caballo M; Mikerov M; Boone JM; Michielsen K; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2022-2036. PubMed ID: 36565012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of ductal carcinoma in-situ from benign micro-calcifications by dedicated breast computed tomography.
Aminololama-Shakeri S; Abbey CK; Gazi P; Prionas ND; Nosratieh A; Li CS; Boone JM; Lindfors KK
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):297-303. PubMed ID: 26520874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Generation of a suite of 3D computer-generated breast phantoms from a limited set of human subject data.
Hsu CM; Palmeri ML; Segars WP; Veress AI; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):043703. PubMed ID: 23556929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
