These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3763970)

  • 1. [Mammography using stationary grids. Qualitative and dosimetric considerations].
    Burke P; Fasciano F; Frigerio A; Spandonari T; Temporelli A
    Radiol Med; 1986 Sep; 72(9):660-3. PubMed ID: 3763970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultra-high-strip-density radiographic grids: a new antiscatter technique for mammography.
    Chan HP; Frank PH; Doi K; Iida N; Higashida Y
    Radiology; 1985 Mar; 154(3):807-15. PubMed ID: 3969487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stationary and moving mammography grids: comparative radiation dose.
    Dershaw DD; Malik S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Sep; 147(3):491-2. PubMed ID: 3488651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance measurements of mammographic systems.
    Bor D; Akyol O; Olgar T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):165-9. PubMed ID: 18448439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Mammography -a guidance level and the present situation of mammographic dose-].
    Terada H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 12766282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparison between traditional mammography and digital with storage phosphors].
    Lambruschi G; Tagliagambe A; Palla L; Torri T; D'Alessandro F; Pastori R; Barbieri L
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 8480050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography using an ultrahigh-strip-density, stationary, focused grid.
    Dershaw DD; Masterson ME; Malik S; Cruz NM
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):541-4. PubMed ID: 4011922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Large breasts, small breasts; which mammographic technic?].
    Hessler C; Depeursinge C; Grecescu M; Raimondi S; Valley JF
    J Radiol; 1986 Feb; 67(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 3712313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of grids in mammography].
    Cervi PM; Campanati A; Orzincolo C; Droghetti M
    Radiol Med; 1987 Mar; 73(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 3562924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of mean glandular dose versus compressed breast thickness relationship for mammography.
    Bor D; Tukel S; Olgar T; Toklu T; Aydin E; Akyol O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):160-4. PubMed ID: 18420560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scanning slit mammography.
    Barnes GT; Wu X; Wagner AJ
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8302215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
    Tsalafoutas OA; Kolovos CA; Tsapaki V; Betsou S; Koliakou E; Maniatis PN; Xenofos S
    Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-contrast mammography with a moving grid: assessment of clinical utility.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1137-9. PubMed ID: 3518365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Image quality and optical density in mammography: study on phantoms].
    Stinés J; Noël A; Estivalet S; Troufléau P; Netter E; Quinquis J
    J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 79(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 9757259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.