These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37640173)

  • 1. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.
    Dodoo SN; Kwapong YA; Agyemang-Sarpong A; Amoran E; Egolum UO; Ghasemzadeh N; Ramadan R; Henry G; Samady H
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Jin C; Yandrapalli S; Yang Y; Liu B; Aronow WS; Naidu SS
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changing Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a Nationwide Registry in Japan.
    Nishimoto Y; Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Sakakura K; Kawai T; Kikuchi A; Watanabe T; Yamada T; Fukunami M; Yamaji K; Ishii H; Amano T; Kozuma K;
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 Dec; 12(23):e031838. PubMed ID: 38038195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients.
    Bhuiyan R; Bimal T; Fishbein J; Gandotra P; Selim S; Ong L; Gruberg L
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():68-73. PubMed ID: 37076412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for High-Risk PCI: A Propensity-Adjusted Large-Scale Claims Dataset Analysis.
    Lansky AJ; Tirziu D; Moses JW; Pietras C; Ohman EM; O'Neill WW; Ekono MM; Grines CL; Parise H
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 185():29-36. PubMed ID: 36210212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
    Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
    Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Use of Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices for ACS Patients with Cardiogenic Shock and High-Risk PCI.
    Manian N; Thakker J; Nair A
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2022 Jun; 24(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 35403950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-aortic balloon pump versus percutaneous Impella
    Frain K; Rees P
    Perfusion; 2024 Jan; 39(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 34479465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.
    Doshi R; Patel K; Decter D; Jauhar R; Meraj P
    Indian Heart J; 2018 Jul; 70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. PubMed ID: 30122245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and haemodynamic support with intra-aortic balloon versus Impella pump: Real-life single-centre preliminary results.
    Januszek R; Pawlik A; Rzeszutko Ł; Bartuś K; Bartuś S
    Kardiol Pol; 2022; 80(12):1224-1231. PubMed ID: 36047958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention requiring mechanical circulatory support in patients without cardiogenic shock.
    Al-Khadra Y; Alraies MC; Darmoch F; Pacha HM; Soud M; Kaki A; Rab T; Grines CL; Meraj P; Alaswad K; Kwok CS; Mamas M; Kapadia S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 31254325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Kim Y; Shapero K; Ahn SS; Goldsweig AM; Desai N; Altin SE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):658-663. PubMed ID: 34156755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra-aortic balloon pump is associated with the lowest whereas Impella with the highest inpatient mortality and complications regardless of severity or hospital types.
    Movahed MR; Talle A; Hashemzadeh M
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2024 Jul; 39(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 38555535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiogenic Shock After the SHOCK-II Trial.
    Nan Tie E; Dinh D; Chan W; Clark DJ; Ajani AE; Brennan A; Dagan M; Cohen N; Oqueli E; Freeman M; Hiew C; Shaw JA; Reid CM; Kaye DM; Stub D; Duffy SJ;
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Mar; 191():125-132. PubMed ID: 36682080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.