BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37640903)

  • 1. Modeling specific aneuploidies: from karyotype manipulations to biological insights.
    Truong MA; Cané-Gasull P; Lens SMA
    Chromosome Res; 2023 Aug; 31(3):25. PubMed ID: 37640903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clonal selection of stable aneuploidies in progenitor cells drives high-prevalence tumorigenesis.
    Trakala M; Aggarwal M; Sniffen C; Zasadil L; Carroll A; Ma D; Su XA; Wangsa D; Meyer A; Sieben CJ; Zhong J; Hsu PH; Paradis G; Ried T; Holland A; Van Deursen J; Amon A
    Genes Dev; 2021 Aug; 35(15-16):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 34266888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Diagnosis of aneuploidy with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); value in pregnancies with increased risk for chromosome aberrations].
    Ulmer R; Pfeiffer RA; Kollert A; Beinder E
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2000; 204(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10721179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptation to spindle assembly checkpoint inhibition through the selection of specific aneuploidies.
    Adell MAY; Klockner TC; Höfler R; Wallner L; Schmid J; Markovic A; Martyniak A; Campbell CS
    Genes Dev; 2023 Mar; 37(5-6):171-190. PubMed ID: 36859339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large-scale analysis of chromosomal aberrations in cancer karyotypes reveals two distinct paths to aneuploidy.
    Ozery-Flato M; Linhart C; Trakhtenbrot L; Izraeli S; Shamir R
    Genome Biol; 2011 Jun; 12(6):R61. PubMed ID: 21714908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Targeting chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in cancer.
    Bhatia S; Khanna KK; Duijf PHG
    Trends Pharmacol Sci; 2024 Mar; 45(3):210-224. PubMed ID: 38355324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chromosome instability and aneuploidy in the mammalian brain.
    Albert O; Sun S; Huttner A; Zhang Z; Suh Y; Campisi J; Vijg J; Montagna C
    Chromosome Res; 2023 Nov; 31(4):32. PubMed ID: 37910282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solving the chromosome puzzle of aneuploidy in cancer.
    Chiarle R
    Genes Dev; 2021 Aug; 35(15-16):1073-1075. PubMed ID: 34341000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies detected by karyomapping.
    Kubicek D; Hornak M; Horak J; Navratil R; Tauwinklova G; Rubes J; Vesela K
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Mar; 38(3):330-339. PubMed ID: 30639160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of monosomies, trisomies and segmental aneuploidies on chromosomal stability.
    Hintzen DC; Soto M; Schubert M; Bakker B; Spierings DCJ; Szuhai K; Lansdorp PM; Kluin RJC; Foijer F; Medema RH; Raaijmakers JA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0268579. PubMed ID: 35776704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human embryonic stem cells as models for aneuploid chromosomal syndromes.
    Biancotti JC; Narwani K; Buehler N; Mandefro B; Golan-Lev T; Yanuka O; Clark A; Hill D; Benvenisty N; Lavon N
    Stem Cells; 2010 Sep; 28(9):1530-40. PubMed ID: 20641042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development.
    Capalbo A; Bono S; Spizzichino L; Biricik A; Baldi M; Colamaria S; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L; Fiorentino F
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):509-18. PubMed ID: 23148203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effectiveness of multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies].
    Jóźwiak A; Bijok J; Massalska D; Pawłowska B; Ilnicka A; Bogdanowicz J; Masternak-Wasiuk K; Jakiel G; Roszkowski T
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):682-90. PubMed ID: 24191501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elevated tolerance to aneuploidy in cancer cells: estimating the fitness effects of chromosome number alterations by in silico modelling of somatic genome evolution.
    Valind A; Jin Y; Gisselsson D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e70445. PubMed ID: 23894657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cytogenetic Investigation in 136 Consecutive Stillbirths: Does the Tissue Type Affect the Success Rate of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Karyotype?
    Marquès B; Benitez L; Peguero A; Madrigal I; Gómez O; Figueras F; Borrell A
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2020; 47(4):315-320. PubMed ID: 31955157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells and comparison of chromosomal abnormality rate during second trimester].
    Zhang YP; Wu JP; Li XT; Lei CX; Xu JZ; Yin M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 46(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 22176986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Traditional karyotyping vs copy number variation sequencing for detection of chromosomal abnormalities associated with spontaneous miscarriage.
    Liu S; Song L; Cram DS; Xiong L; Wang K; Wu R; Liu J; Deng K; Jia B; Zhong M; Yang F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25767059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. KaryoCreate: A CRISPR-based technology to study chromosome-specific aneuploidy by targeting human centromeres.
    Bosco N; Goldberg A; Zhao X; Mays JC; Cheng P; Johnson AF; Bianchi JJ; Toscani C; Di Tommaso E; Katsnelson L; Annuar D; Mei S; Faitelson RE; Pesselev IY; Mohamed KS; Mermerian A; Camacho-Hernandez EM; Gionco CA; Manikas J; Tseng YS; Sun Z; Fani S; Keegan S; Lippman SM; Fenyö D; Giunta S; Santaguida S; Davoli T
    Cell; 2023 Apr; 186(9):1985-2001.e19. PubMed ID: 37075754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of aneuploidy concordance between clinical trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst.
    Victor AR; Griffin DK; Brake AJ; Tyndall JC; Murphy AE; Lepkowsky LT; Lal A; Zouves CG; Barnes FL; McCoy RC; Viotti M
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 30418565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transient genomic instability drives tumorigenesis through accelerated clonal evolution.
    Shoshani O; Bakker B; de Haan L; Tijhuis AE; Wang Y; Kim DH; Maldonado M; Demarest MA; Artates J; Zhengyu O; Mark A; Wardenaar R; Sasik R; Spierings DCJ; Vitre B; Fisch K; Foijer F; Cleveland DW
    Genes Dev; 2021 Aug; 35(15-16):1093-1108. PubMed ID: 34266887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.