These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37640961)

  • 1. Why we need to abandon fixed cutoffs for goodness-of-fit indices: An extensive simulation and possible solutions.
    Groskurth K; Bluemke M; Lechner CM
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3891-3914. PubMed ID: 37640961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. dynamic : An R Package for Deriving Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Factor Analysis.
    Wolf MG; McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):189-194. PubMed ID: 36787513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models.
    McNeish D; Wolf MG
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1157-1174. PubMed ID: 35585278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models.
    McNeish D; Wolf MG
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):61-88. PubMed ID: 34694832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What are the consequences of ignoring cross-loadings in bifactor models? A simulation study assessing parameter recovery and sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indices.
    Ximénez C; Revuelta J; Castañeda R
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():923877. PubMed ID: 36092049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalizability of Dynamic Fit Index, Equivalence Testing, and Hu & Bentler Cutoffs for Evaluating Fit in Factor Analysis.
    McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):195-219. PubMed ID: 36787523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree.
    Lai K; Green SB
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(2-3):220-39. PubMed ID: 27014948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):409-428. PubMed ID: 29869222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating Equivalence Testing Methods for Measurement Invariance.
    Counsell A; Cribbie RA; Flora DB
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(2):312-328. PubMed ID: 31389729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model Fit and Item Factor Analysis: Overfactoring, Underfactoring, and a Program to Guide Interpretation.
    Clark DA; Bowles RP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(4):544-558. PubMed ID: 29683723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.
    Shi D; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):421-445. PubMed ID: 32425213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting Misspecified Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Common Fit Indices: A Monte Carlo Study.
    Hsu HY; Kwok OM; Lin JH; Acosta S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(2):197-215. PubMed ID: 26609878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.
    Heene M; Hilbert S; Draxler C; Ziegler M; Bühner M
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):319-36. PubMed ID: 21843002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factor structure of the 10-item CES-D Scale among patients with persistent COVID-19.
    Ramírez-Vélez R; Olabarrieta-Landa L; Rivera D; Izquierdo M
    J Med Virol; 2023 Jan; 95(1):e28236. PubMed ID: 36258275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation.
    Curran PJ; Bollen KA; Paxton P; Kirby J; Chen F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2002 Jan; 37(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 26824167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Pandemic Stressor Scale: factorial validity and reliability of a measure of stressors during a pandemic.
    Lotzin A; Ketelsen R; Zrnic I; Lueger-Schuster B; Böttche M; Schäfer I
    BMC Psychol; 2022 Apr; 10(1):92. PubMed ID: 35395827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.
    Savalei V
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 32054327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages of Using Unweighted Approximation Error Measures for Model Fit Assessment.
    Lubbe D
    Psychometrika; 2023 Jun; 88(2):413-433. PubMed ID: 37071271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Poor Fit of Model Fit for Selecting Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Scale Evaluation.
    Montoya AK; Edwards MC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Jun; 81(3):413-440. PubMed ID: 33994558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.