These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37641122)

  • 1. Articaine versus Lidocaine in only buccal infiltration anesthesia for the extraction of mandibular anterior teeth. A prospective split-mouth randomized-controlled clinical study.
    Al-Mahalawy H; El-Mahallawy Y; Abdelrahman HH; Refahee SM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):604. PubMed ID: 37641122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the only buccal infiltration anesthesia enough for extraction of mandibular anterior incisors and premolar teeth? A split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Ege B; Demirkol M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):3077-3085. PubMed ID: 33051814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Majid OW; Ahmed AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.
    Rathi NV; Khatri AA; Agrawal AG; M SB; Thosar NR; Deolia SG
    Anesth Prog; 2019; 66(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30883236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of primary mandibular molars: A prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.
    Jain K; Katge F; Chimata VK; Patil D; Ghadge S; Bhanushali N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(4):409-415. PubMed ID: 35102967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 22414822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of Articaine Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia for Mandibular Premolar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Majid OW; Muhammad ZA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 77(9):1784-1789. PubMed ID: 31028737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient's pain perception during mandibular molar extraction with articaine: a comparison study between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Bataineh AB; Alwarafi MA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2241-2250. PubMed ID: 26791025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is nasopalatine nerve block still mandated for the extraction of maxillary anterior teeth?
    Al-Mahalawy HA; El-Mahallawy Y
    Br Dent J; 2020 Jun; 228(11):865-868. PubMed ID: 32541749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in block and infiltration anesthesia administered in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
    Ashraf H; Kazem M; Dianat O; Noghrehkar F
    J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 23228249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Efficacy of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Lidocaine in Inducing Palatal Anesthesia for Tooth Extraction in Different Maxillary Regions.
    Gholami M; Banihashemrad A; Mohammadzadeh A; Ahrari F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 79(8):1643-1649. PubMed ID: 33757745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Split-mouth Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine for Extractions of Deciduous Maxillary Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Jankar JL; Pustake BJ
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2024 Apr; 17(Suppl 1):S6-S10. PubMed ID: 39185253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction.
    Bataineh AB; Nusair YM; Al-Rahahleh RQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3239-3248. PubMed ID: 30417227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of buccal infiltration anaesthesia with articaine for extraction of mandibular molars: a clinical trial.
    Rayati F; Noruziha A; Jabbarian R
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):607-610. PubMed ID: 29980352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extraction of Maxillary Teeth Using Articaine Without a Palatal Injection: A Comparison Between the Anterior and Posterior Regions of the Maxilla.
    Bataineh AB; Al-Sabri GA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 27528103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of an additional lingual infiltration in the pulpal anesthesia of mandibular teeth: a systematic review.
    Dou L; Luo J; Yang D; Wang Y
    Quintessence Int; 2013 May; 44(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 23479588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for combination labial plus lingual infiltrations versus labial infiltration in the mandibular lateral incisor.
    Nuzum FM; Drum M; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2010 Jun; 36(6):952-6. PubMed ID: 20478446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Preoperative Oral Ketorolac on Anesthetic Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal and Lingual Infiltration with Articaine and Lidocaine in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study.
    Yadav M; Grewal MS; Grewal S; Deshwal P
    J Endod; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1773-7. PubMed ID: 26410153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial.
    Rayati F; Haeri M; Norouziha A; Jabbarian R
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 59(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 34053801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.