150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37641292)
1. Effect of milk flow-rate switch-point settings on milking duration and udder health throughout lactation.
Upton J; Browne M; Silva Boloña P
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Dec; 106(12):8861-8870. PubMed ID: 37641292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of milk flow rate switch-point settings on cow comfort and milking duration.
Upton J; Browne M; Silva Bolona P
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Apr; 106(4):2438-2448. PubMed ID: 36870830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on production, udder health, and milking duration.
Jago JG; Burke JL; Williamson JH
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jun; 93(6):2541-9. PubMed ID: 20494162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term application of prestimulation and increased automatic cluster remover threshold affect milking characteristics of grazing dairy cows in late lactation.
Edwards JP; Jago JG; Lopez-Villalobos N
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1886-93. PubMed ID: 23332836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Different vacuum levels, vacuum reduction during low milk flow, and different cluster detachment levels affect milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
Stauffer C; Feierabend M; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9250-9260. PubMed ID: 32747105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short communication: Increasing the teatcup removal settings of the last milking quarter did not reduce box time in a pasture-based automatic milking system.
Boloña PS; Reinemann DJ; Upton J
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jan; 104(1):532-538. PubMed ID: 33189272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial to study the effect of automatic cluster remover settings on milking performance, teat condition, and udder health.
Wieland M; Nydam DV; Heuwieser W; Morrill KM; Ferlito L; Watters RD; Virkler PD
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3668-3682. PubMed ID: 32008782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Associations of herd- and cow-level factors, cow lying behavior, and risk of elevated somatic cell count in free-stall housed lactating dairy cows.
Watters ME; Meijer KM; Barkema HW; Leslie KE; von Keyserlingk MA; Devries TJ
Prev Vet Med; 2013 Sep; 111(3-4):245-55. PubMed ID: 23791124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduced liner-open phase and vacuum instead of prestimulation increase parlor efficiency in dairy cows.
Tuor M; Jenni B; Wellnitz O; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):1533-1541. PubMed ID: 34955277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence and duration of increased somatic cell count in Swedish dairy cows and associations with milking system type.
Frössling J; Ohlson A; Hallén-Sandgren C
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7368-7378. PubMed ID: 28647335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of pulsation ratio on teat condition, milk somatic cell count and productivity in dairy cows in automatic milking.
Ferneborg S; Svennersten-Sjaunja K
J Dairy Res; 2015 Nov; 82(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 26411595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of simulated quarter and udder teat cup removal settings on strip milk and milking duration in dairy cows.
Silva Boloña P; Upton J; Reinemann DJ
J Dairy Sci; 2020 May; 103(5):4446-4454. PubMed ID: 32113765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of mechanical premilking stimulation on milking duration in late lactation.
Upton J; Browne M; Silva Bolona P
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Jan; 106(1):294-301. PubMed ID: 36333147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of selective dry cow treatment on udder health and antimicrobial usage on Dutch dairy farms.
Tijs SHW; Holstege MMC; Scherpenzeel CGM; Santman-Berends IMGA; Velthuis AGJ; Lam TJGM
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5381-5392. PubMed ID: 35379456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Udder health of dairy cows fed different dietary energy levels after a short or no dry period without use of dry cow antibiotics.
van Hoeij RJ; Lam TJGM; Bruckmaier RM; Dijkstra J; Remmelink GJ; Kemp B; van Knegsel ATM
J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4570-4585. PubMed ID: 29454698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internal teat sealants alone or in combination with antibiotics at dry-off - the effect on udder health in dairy cows in five commercial herds.
Clabby C; McParland S; Dillon P; Arkins S; Flynn J; Murphy J; Boloña PS
Animal; 2022 Feb; 16(2):100449. PubMed ID: 35078119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of automatic cluster remover settings on average milking duration, milk flow, and milk yield.
Stewart S; Godden S; Rapnicki P; Reid D; Johnson A; Eicker S
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Apr; 85(4):818-23. PubMed ID: 12018428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Premilking teat preparation for Australian pasture-based cows milked by an automated milking system.
Davis KL; Fulkerson WJ; Garcia SC; Dickeson D; Barchia IM
J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jul; 91(7):2604-9. PubMed ID: 18565919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without a latency period, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows.
Singh A; Geary CM; Case KL; Juran I; Olszanski L; Sytch N; Womack SJ; Dahl M; Spellman ME; Wieland M
J Dairy Sci; 2024 Mar; 107(3):1719-1733. PubMed ID: 37769948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving parlor efficiency in block calving pasture-based dairy systems through the application of a fixed milking time determined by daily milk yield and milking frequency.
Edwards JP; Williamson JH; Kuhn-Sherlock B
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Sep; 105(9):7513-7524. PubMed ID: 35879166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
