These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37641303)

  • 1. Comparison of different validation methods for single-step genomic evaluations based on a simulated cattle population.
    Himmelbauer J; Schwarzenbacher H; Fuerst C; Fuerst-Waltl B
    J Dairy Sci; 2023 Dec; 106(12):9026-9043. PubMed ID: 37641303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
    Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient large-scale single-step evaluations and indirect genomic prediction of genotyped selection candidates.
    Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Darbaghshahi SN; Evans R; Calus MPL; Veerkamp R; Cromie A; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):37. PubMed ID: 37291510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
    Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The prediction accuracies of linear-type traits in Czech Holstein cattle when using ssGBLUP or wssGBLUP.
    Brzáková M; Bauer J; Steyn Y; Šplíchal J; Fulínová D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36334266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact and utility of shallow pedigree using single-step genomic BLUP for prediction of unbiased genomic breeding values.
    Gowane GR; Alex R; Mukherjee A; Vohra V
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Oct; 54(6):339. PubMed ID: 36210357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
    Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Avoiding preselection bias in subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluations of genomically preselected animals.
    Jibrila I; Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Jul; 138(4):432-441. PubMed ID: 33372707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):923-939. PubMed ID: 34799109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical note: Automatic scaling in single-step genomic BLUP.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Feb; 104(2):2027-2031. PubMed ID: 33309381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values.
    Přibyl J; Bauer J; Čermák V; Pešek P; Přibylová J; Šplíchal J; Vostrá-Vydrová H; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
    Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1635-42. PubMed ID: 26133272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
    Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic evaluation of a relatively small dairy cattle population by combination with a larger population.
    Weller JI; Stoop WM; Eding H; Schrooten C; Ezra E
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4945-55. PubMed ID: 25935250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multitrait genomic prediction of methane emissions in Danish Holstein cattle.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Gordo D; Difford GF; Løvendahl P; Lassen J
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9195-9206. PubMed ID: 32747097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic evaluation of carcass traits of Korean beef cattle Hanwoo using a single-step marker effect model.
    Koo Y; Alkhoder H; Choi TJ; Liu Z; Reents R
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37004242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current status of genomic evaluation.
    Misztal I; Lourenco D; Legarra A
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 98(4):. PubMed ID: 32267923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs.
    Jibrila I; Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Bergsma R; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jun; 54(1):48. PubMed ID: 35764921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.