These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37644538)
1. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Farah E; Abreu AA; Rail B; Salgado J; Karagkounis G; Zeh HJ; Polanco PM World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 21(1):272. PubMed ID: 37644538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The robotic approach significantly reduces length of stay after colectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Al-Mazrou AM; Chiuzan C; Kiran RP Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Oct; 32(10):1415-1421. PubMed ID: 28685223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Bhama AR; Obias V; Welch KB; Vandewarker JF; Cleary RK Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1576-84. PubMed ID: 26169638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes of elective robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer utilizing a large national database. Ahuja V; Paredes LG; Leeds IL; Perkal MF; King JT Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7199-7205. PubMed ID: 37365394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic elective colectomy: where are the benefits? Kulaylat AS; Mirkin KA; Puleo FJ; Hollenbeak CS; Messaris E J Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 224():72-78. PubMed ID: 29506855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes After Robotic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection. Al-Mazrou AM; Baser O; Kiran RP J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Jun; 22(6):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29404985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Regional and National Database Comparison of Colorectal Outcomes. Batool F; Collins SD; Albright J; Ferraro J; Wu J; Krapohl GL; Campbell DA; Cleary RK JSLS; 2018; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 30410300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative analysis of outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic elective (procto-) colectomies for benign and malignant disease. Huerta S; Meier J; Emuakhagbon VS; Favela J; Argo M; Polanco PM; Augustine MM; Pham T J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 32297148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic versus laparoscopic elective colectomy for left side diverticulitis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the NSQIP database. Al-Temimi MH; Chandrasekaran B; Agapian J; Peters WR; Wells KO Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1385-1392. PubMed ID: 31230107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial experience of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a matched case-control study. de'Angelis N; Alghamdi S; Renda A; Azoulay D; Brunetti F World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 13():295. PubMed ID: 26452727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic Approach is Associated With a Lower Conversion Rate Compared to Laparoscopic Approach for Patients Undergoing Colectomy for T4b Colon Cancer. An Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Kamel MK; Al-Qudah G; Shchatsko A; Keane CA; Serpa E; Nituica C; Blebea J; Marar O Surg Innov; 2023 Apr; 30(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 36069752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Dohrn N; Klein MF; Gögenur I Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Oct; 36(10):2147-2158. PubMed ID: 34076746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive right versus left colectomy for cancer: does robotic surgery mitigate differences in short-term outcomes? Nasseri Y; Kasheri E; Oka K; Cox B; Cohen J; Ellenhorn J; Barnajian M J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):875-881. PubMed ID: 34581955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison. Ceccarelli G; Costa G; Ferraro V; De Rosa M; Rondelli F; Bugiantella W Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2039-2048. PubMed ID: 32372219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of robotic multivisceral resections in colorectal cancer patients: a NSQIP-based study. Radomski SN; Chen SY; Done JZ; Stem M; Safar B; Efron JE; Atallah C J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):2929-2936. PubMed ID: 37837599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of obesity on laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colorectal surgery outcomes: an ACS-NSQIP database analysis. Harr JN; Haskins IN; Amdur RL; Agarwal S; Obias V J Robot Surg; 2018 Jun; 12(2):317-323. PubMed ID: 28900886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in morbidly obese patients: A propensity score-matched analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Juang SE; Chung KC; Cheng KC; Wu KL; Song LC; Tang CE; Chen HH; Lee KC J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1510-1519. PubMed ID: 37194165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience. Palomba G; Dinuzzi VP; Capuano M; Anoldo P; Milone M; De Palma GD; Aprea G J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):981-987. PubMed ID: 34743288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]