These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37645068)

  • 21. Crossmodal Correspondences: Standing Issues and Experimental Guidelines.
    Parise CV
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):7-28. PubMed ID: 27311289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences.
    Mennella JA; Pepino MY; Reed DR
    Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e216-22. PubMed ID: 15687429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the Relative Nature of (Pitch-Based) Crossmodal Correspondences.
    Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(3):235-265. PubMed ID: 31059485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A bittersweet symphony: Evidence for taste-sound correspondences without effects on taste quality-specific perception.
    Höchenberger R; Ohla K
    J Neurosci Res; 2019 Mar; 97(3):267-275. PubMed ID: 30027567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The sweetest thing: the influence of angularity, symmetry, and the number of elements on shape-valence and shape-taste matches.
    Salgado-Montejo A; Alvarado JA; Velasco C; Salgado CJ; Hasse K; Spence C
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1382. PubMed ID: 26441757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An Investigation of the Relationships Between Autistic Traits and Crossmodal Correspondences in Typically Developing Adults.
    Hidaka S; Yaguchi A
    Multisens Res; 2018 Jan; 31(8):729-751. PubMed ID: 31264620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cognitive Styles Differentiate Crossmodal Correspondences Between Pitch Glide and Visual Apparent Motion.
    Guo L; Bao M; Guan L; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2017 Jan; 30(3-5):363-385. PubMed ID: 31287072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the Role of Taste Intensity and Hedonics in Taste-Shape Correspondences.
    Velasco C; Woods A; Liu J; Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):209-21. PubMed ID: 27311297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Timbre and Visual Shape.
    Gurman D; McCormick CR; Klein RM
    Multisens Res; 2021 Dec; 35(3):221-241. PubMed ID: 35065536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using crossmodal correspondences as a tool in wine communication.
    Crichton-Fock A; Spence C; Pettersson N
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1190364. PubMed ID: 37583598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. "Turn Up the Taste": Assessing the Role of Taste Intensity and Emotion in Mediating Crossmodal Correspondences between Basic Tastes and Pitch.
    Wang QJ; Wang S; Spence C
    Chem Senses; 2016 May; 41(4):345-56. PubMed ID: 26873934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A composition algorithm based on crossmodal taste-music correspondences.
    Mesz B; Sigman M; Trevisan MA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():71. PubMed ID: 22557952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Temperature-Based Crossmodal Correspondences: Causes and Consequences.
    Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Oct; 33(6):645-682. PubMed ID: 31923885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test.
    Parise CV; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 220(3-4):319-33. PubMed ID: 22706551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fast lemons and sour boulders: Testing crossmodal correspondences using an internet-based testing methodology.
    Woods AT; Spence C; Butcher N; Deroy O
    Iperception; 2013; 4(6):365-79. PubMed ID: 24349696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Smelling shapes: crossmodal correspondences between odors and shapes.
    Hanson-Vaux G; Crisinel AS; Spence C
    Chem Senses; 2013 Feb; 38(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 23118203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting the crossmodal correspondences of odors using an electronic nose.
    Ward RJ; Rahman S; Wuerger S; Marshall A
    Heliyon; 2022 Apr; 8(4):e09284. PubMed ID: 35497032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes.
    Deroy O; Crisinel AS; Spence C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):878-96. PubMed ID: 23463615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Crossmodal correspondences as common ground for joint action.
    Schmitz L; Knoblich G; Deroy O; Vesper C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103222. PubMed ID: 33302228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of Bouba- and Kiki-like shape on perceived taste of chocolate pieces.
    Ogata K; Gakumi R; Hashimoto A; Ushiku Y; Yoshida S
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1170674. PubMed ID: 37397323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.