These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3764576)

  • 1. [Quality control of mammography in daily practice].
    Hering KG
    Rontgenpraxis; 1986 Jul; 39(7):230-2. PubMed ID: 3764576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality criteria and quality control in mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():63-75. PubMed ID: 2860867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality control in mammography. Everyone has a role. American College of Radiology.
    Haus A
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Nov; 11(11):123, 125-6, 129-30. PubMed ID: 10123210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeat exposures: our little secret.
    McKinney WE
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 7755686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality control in mammography.
    Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.
    Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R
    J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G
    JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992. History and philosophy.
    Houn F; Elliott ML; McCrohan JL
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1059-65. PubMed ID: 7480655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MQSA update.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2003; 74(3):202-20; quiz 221-4, 227. PubMed ID: 12584968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Reliability of various tools for the quality control of mammography].
    Di Maggio C; Gennaro G; Cattozzo S
    Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 10051877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Present-day technical support of mammography].
    Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Kochetova GP; Riudiger IuG; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2000; (1):50-2. PubMed ID: 10832400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality mammography standards--FDA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(214):59750-1. PubMed ID: 10187387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 1998 MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) final rule released. American College of Radiology.
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 10181472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent].
    Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S
    Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technological improvements in mammography over the past 20 years.
    Haus AG
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8302212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Technical problems in low-voltage radiography of the breast].
    Yamazaki T; Hamada T; Miura T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1967 Jul; 27(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 5237729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.