197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37646217)
1. Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Saito Y; Tateishi K; Toda K; Matsumiya G; Kobayashi Y;
J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 Sep; 12(17):e030819. PubMed ID: 37646217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Jin C; Yandrapalli S; Yang Y; Liu B; Aronow WS; Naidu SS
J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.
Wilkins CE; Herrera TL; Nagahiro MK; Weathers LB; Girotra SV; Sandhu F
J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 31(2):E23-E29. PubMed ID: 30700627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Miyashita S; Banlengchit R; Marbach JA; Chweich H; Kawabori M; Kimmelstiel CD; Kapur NK
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jun; 39():28-35. PubMed ID: 34824038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience.
Ouweneel DM; de Brabander J; Karami M; Sjauw KD; Engström AE; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Beijk MA; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; Cherpanath TG; Driessen AH; Cocchieri R; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2019 Jun; 8(4):338-349. PubMed ID: 30403366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization.
Tarantini G; Masiero G; Burzotta F; Pazzanese V; Briguori C; Trani C; Piva T; De Marco F; Di Biasi M; Pagnotta P; Mojoli M; Casu G; Giustino G; Lorenzoni G; Montorfano M; Ancona MB; Pappalardo F; Chieffo A;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Aug; 98(2):E222-E234. PubMed ID: 33793051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex-Related Differences in Short-Term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Impella Support in Japan: From the J-PVAD Registry.
Nakamura M; Imamura T; Ueno H; Kinugawa K; Investigators JP
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jun; 59(7):. PubMed ID: 37512020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A goal-oriented hemodynamic approach to acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock-A single center experience.
Siebert V; Goldstein J; Khan R; Lopez J; Darki A; Lewis B; Steen L; Doukas D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Oct; 102(4):569-576. PubMed ID: 37548088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.
Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Timing of mechanical circulatory support during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Archilletti F; Giuliani L; Dangas GD; Ricci F; Benedetto U; Radico F; Gallina S; Rossi S; Maddestra N; Zimarino M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 99(4):998-1005. PubMed ID: 35182020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes of hundred large Impella implantations in cardiogenic shock patients based on individual clinical scenarios.
Sugimura Y; Bauer S; Immohr MB; Mehdiani A; Rellecke P; Tudorache I; Horn P; Westenfeld R; Boeken U; Aubin H; Lichtenberg A; Akhyari P
Artif Organs; 2023 Dec; 47(12):1874-1884. PubMed ID: 37724611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data.
Wernly B; Seelmaier C; Leistner D; Stähli BE; Pretsch I; Lichtenauer M; Jung C; Hoppe UC; Landmesser U; Thiele H; Lauten A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 108(11):1249-1257. PubMed ID: 30900010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiogenic shock etiology and exit strategy impact survival in patients with Impella 5.5.
Sicke M; Modi S; Hong Y; Bashline M; Klass W; Horn E; Hansra BS; Ramanan R; Fowler J; Sumzin N; Rivosecchi RM; Chaudhary R; Ziegler LA; Hess NR; Agrawal N; Kaczorowski DJ; Hickey GW
Int J Artif Organs; 2024 Jan; 47(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 38053245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impella in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: History and Current Controversies.
Panhwar MS; Reed GW; Jain V; Ayoub A; Menon V; Lahorra JA; Kanaa'N A; Hedrick DP; Kapadia SR; LeJemtel T; Kalra A
J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Oct; 34(10):E709-E719. PubMed ID: 36001457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
