196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37646463)
1. Pre-whitened matched filter and convolutional neural network based model observer performance for mass lesion detection in non-contrast breast CT.
Lyu SH; Abbey CK; Hernandez AM; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7558-7567. PubMed ID: 37646463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Model observer performance in contrast-enhanced lesions in breast CT: The influence of contrast concentration on detectability.
Lyu SH; Hernandez AM; Shakeri SA; Abbey CK; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):6748-6761. PubMed ID: 37639329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions.
Packard NJ; Abbey CK; Yang K; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1818-30. PubMed ID: 22482604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microcalcification detectability in breast CT images using CNN observers.
Lyu SH; Abbey CK; Hernandez AM; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):933-945. PubMed ID: 38154070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strategy to implement a convolutional neural network based ideal model observer via transfer learning for multi-slice simulated breast CT images.
Kim G; Han M; Baek J
Phys Med Biol; 2023 May; 68(11):. PubMed ID: 37137323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A convolutional neural network-based model observer for breast CT images.
Kim G; Han M; Shim H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1619-1632. PubMed ID: 32017147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CNN as model observer in a liver lesion detection task for x-ray computed tomography: A phantom study.
Kopp FK; Catalano M; Pfeiffer D; Fingerle AA; Rummeny EJ; Noël PB
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4439-4447. PubMed ID: 30137658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Convolutional neural network-based model observer for signal known statistically task in breast tomosynthesis images.
Jang H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6390-6408. PubMed ID: 36971505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.
Chen L; Boone JM; Abbey CK; Hargreaves J; Bateni C; Lindfors KK; Yang K; Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Gazi P
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3347-58. PubMed ID: 25825980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A convolutional neural network-based anthropomorphic model observer for signal-known-statistically and background-known-statistically detection tasks.
Han M; Baek J
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(22):225025. PubMed ID: 33032268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A performance comparison of convolutional neural network-based image denoising methods: The effect of loss functions on low-dose CT images.
Kim B; Han M; Shim H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3906-3923. PubMed ID: 31306488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A performance comparison of anthropomorphic model observers for breast cone beam CT images: A single-slice and multislice study.
Han M; Baek J
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3431-3441. PubMed ID: 31106432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-dose CT denoising via convolutional neural network with an observer loss function.
Han M; Shim H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):5727-5742. PubMed ID: 34387360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A deep learning- and partial least square regression-based model observer for a low-contrast lesion detection task in CT.
Gong H; Yu L; Leng S; Dilger SK; Ren L; Zhou W; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2052-2063. PubMed ID: 30889282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shading artifact correction in breast CT using an interleaved deep learning segmentation and maximum-likelihood polynomial fitting approach.
Ghazi P; Hernandez AM; Abbey C; Yang K; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3414-3430. PubMed ID: 31102462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between human observer performance and model observer performance in differential phase contrast CT.
Li K; Garrett J; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111905. PubMed ID: 24320438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep learning for x-ray scatter correction in dedicated breast CT.
Pautasso JJ; Caballo M; Mikerov M; Boone JM; Michielsen K; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2022-2036. PubMed ID: 36565012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.
Leng S; Yu L; Zhang Y; Carter R; Toledano AY; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081908. PubMed ID: 23927322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.
Gifford HC; Liang Z; Das M
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1563-75. PubMed ID: 26936739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose reduction and image enhancement in micro-CT using deep learning.
Muller FM; Maebe J; Vanhove C; Vandenberghe S
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5643-5656. PubMed ID: 36994779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
