These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37646611)

  • 21. Groundwater flow velocities in a fractured carbonate aquifer-type: Implications for contaminant transport.
    Medici G; West LJ; Banwart SA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Apr; 222():1-16. PubMed ID: 30795856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Water planning in a mixed land use Mediterranean area: point-source abstraction and pollution scenarios by a numerical model of varying stream-aquifer regime.
    Du M; Fouché O; Zavattero E; Ma Q; Delestre O; Gourbesville P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jan; 26(3):2145-2166. PubMed ID: 29470755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using hydrochemical data and modelling to enhance the knowledge of groundwater flow and quality in an alluvial aquifer of Zagreb, Croatia.
    Marković T; Brkić Ž; Larva O
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Aug; 458-460():508-16. PubMed ID: 23707721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of Transient Flow to an Extended Fully Penetrating Well at Constant-Head Pumping.
    Jhuang WH; Fen CS; Shen YT; Yeh HD
    Ground Water; 2020 Jan; 58(1):119-124. PubMed ID: 31025321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determination of specific yield for the Biscayne Aquifer with a canal-drawdown test.
    Bolster CH; Genereux DP; Saiers JE
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(5):768-77. PubMed ID: 11554256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 2D model of groundwater flow and total dissolved HCH transport through the Gállego alluvial aquifer downstream the Sardas landfill (Huesca, Spain).
    Sobral B; Samper J; Montenegro L; Mon A; Guadaño J; Gómez J; San Román J; Delgado F; Fernández J
    J Contam Hydrol; 2024 Jul; 265():104370. PubMed ID: 38851128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How to Find Aquifer Statistics Utilizing Pumping Tests? Two Field Studies Using welltestpy.
    Müller S; Leven C; Dietrich P; Attinger S; Zech A
    Ground Water; 2022 Jan; 60(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 34231221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Semi-Analytical Modeling of Transient Stream Drawdown and Depletion in Response to Aquifer Pumping.
    Malama B; Lin YF; Kuhlman KL
    Ground Water; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38961724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Regional flow and deformation analysis of Basin-fill aquifer systems using stress-dependent parameters.
    Preisig G; Cornaton FJ; Perrochet P
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 23448260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of aquifer hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity of Ezza/Ikwo area, Southeastern Nigeria, using pumping test and surficial resistivity techniques.
    Oli IC; Opara AI; Okeke OC; Akaolisa CZ; Akakuru OC; Osi-Okeke I; Udeh HM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Sep; 194(10):719. PubMed ID: 36053394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Integrating hydrogeochemical, hydrogeological, and environmental tracer data to understand groundwater flow for a karstified aquifer system.
    Pavlovskiy I; Selle B
    Ground Water; 2015 Apr; 53 Suppl 1():156-65. PubMed ID: 25178951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Analytical Method for Assessing Recharge Using Groundwater Travel Time in Dupuit-Forchheimer Aquifers.
    Chesnaux R; Santoni S; Garel E; Huneau F
    Ground Water; 2018 Nov; 56(6):986-992. PubMed ID: 29732535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An improved technology for monitoring groundwater flow velocity and direction in fractured rock system based on colloidal particles motion.
    Hu F; Huang CS; Han JH; Huang W; Li X; Hou BQ; Akram W; Li L; Liu XH; Chen W; Zhao ZL; Zhan J; Xu LS; Shan H; Li XZ; Han WJ; Yin ZB; Wang ZZ; Xiao TF
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):7685. PubMed ID: 38561405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of confined aquifer response to recharge variations and water inflow distributions using analytical approach.
    Zarif Sanayei HR; Javdanian H; Rakhshandehroo GR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(36):50878-50889. PubMed ID: 33973116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Impact of the Degree of Aquifer Confinement and Anisotropy on Tidal Pulse Propagation.
    Shuai P; Knappett PSK; Hossain S; Hosain A; Rhodes K; Ahmed KM; Cardenas MB
    Ground Water; 2017 Jul; 55(4):519-531. PubMed ID: 28273686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Monitoring transient groundwater fluxes using the Finite Volume Point Dilution Method.
    Jamin P; Brouyère S
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Nov; 218():10-18. PubMed ID: 30195886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Flowing Well-Time-Domain Solution and Inverse Problem Revisited.
    Perina T
    Ground Water; 2021 May; 59(3):438-442. PubMed ID: 33314058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A numerical model and spreadsheet interface for pumping test analysis.
    Johnson GS; Cosgrove DM; Frederick DB
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(4):582-92. PubMed ID: 11447858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A geochemical approach to determine sources and movement of saline groundwater in a coastal aquifer.
    Anders R; Mendez GO; Futa K; Danskin WR
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(5):756-68. PubMed ID: 24032352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simulation of water-table aquifers using specified saturated thickness.
    Sheets RA; Hill MC; Haitjema HM; Provost AM; Masterson JP
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 24502651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.