These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37647247)

  • 1. Estimating the false discovery risk of (randomized) clinical trials in medical journals based on published p-values.
    Schimmack U; Bartoš F
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0290084. PubMed ID: 37647247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.
    Turner L; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Weeks L; Peters J; Kober T; Dias S; Schulz KF; Plint AC; Moher D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):MR000030. PubMed ID: 23152285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
    Jager LR; Leek JT
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts.
    Nissen SB; Magidson T; Gross K; Bergstrom CT
    Elife; 2016 Dec; 5():. PubMed ID: 27995896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false.
    Ioannidis JP
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):28-36; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Number and quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics published in the top general medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals.
    Doulaveris G; Vani K; Saccone G; Chauhan SP; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100509. PubMed ID: 34656731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-throughput analysis suggests differences in journal false discovery rate by subject area and impact factor but not open access status.
    Hall LM; Hendricks AE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 21(1):564. PubMed ID: 33297936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials in high-impact ophthalmology journals and general medical journals: a systematic review.
    Joksimovic L; Koucheki R; Popovic M; Ahmed Y; Schlenker MB; Ahmed IIK
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 101(10):1309-1314. PubMed ID: 28659390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The risk of false-positive results in orthopaedic surgical trials.
    Bhandari M; Whang W; Kuo JC; Devereaux PJ; Sprague S; Tornetta P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):63-9. PubMed ID: 12897597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized trials published in Chinese or Western journals: comparative empirical analysis.
    Purgato M; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2012 Jun; 32(3):354-61. PubMed ID: 22544018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research Integrity at Risk: Predatory Journals Are a Growing Threat.
    Angadi PV; Kaur H
    Arch Iran Med; 2020 Feb; 23(2):113-116. PubMed ID: 32061074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protocol adherence rates in superiority and noninferiority randomized clinical trials published in high impact medical journals.
    Bamat NA; Ekhaguere OA; Zhang L; Flannery DD; Handley SC; Herrick HM; Ellenberg SS
    Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 32666826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication.
    Friedman PJ
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1416-9. PubMed ID: 2406474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication bias in clinical research.
    Easterbrook PJ; Berlin JA; Gopalan R; Matthews DR
    Lancet; 1991 Apr; 337(8746):867-72. PubMed ID: 1672966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical radiology research in Pakistan: from evidence to practice.
    Akhtar W; Ali A; Aslam M; Gul-e-khanda
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2009 Aug; 59(8):544-6. PubMed ID: 19757702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The distribution of P-values in medical research articles suggested selective reporting associated with statistical significance.
    Perneger TV; Combescure C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():70-77. PubMed ID: 28400294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties.
    Hoffmann T; Erueti C; Thorning S; Glasziou P
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e3223. PubMed ID: 22597353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publication bias for CAM trials in the highest impact factor medicine journals is partly due to geographical bias.
    Sood A; Knudsen K; Sood R; Wahner-Roedler DL; Barnes SA; Bardia A; Bauer BA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 60(11):1123-6. PubMed ID: 17938053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timely and complete publication of economic evaluations alongside randomized controlled trials.
    Thorn JC; Noble SM; Hollingworth W
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Jan; 31(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23329594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.