These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37650641)

  • 1. Widespread effects of DNA methylation and intra-motif dependencies revealed by novel transcription factor binding models.
    Grau J; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Oct; 51(18):e95. PubMed ID: 37650641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a base-resolution panorama of the in vivo impact of cytosine methylation on transcription factor binding.
    Hernandez-Corchado A; Najafabadi HS
    Genome Biol; 2022 Jul; 23(1):151. PubMed ID: 35799193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motif models proposing independent and interdependent impacts of nucleotides are related to high and low affinity transcription factor binding sites in Arabidopsis.
    Tsukanov AV; Mironova VV; Levitsky VG
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():938545. PubMed ID: 35968123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Base-resolution methylation patterns accurately predict transcription factor bindings in vivo.
    Xu T; Li B; Zhao M; Szulwach KE; Street RC; Lin L; Yao B; Zhang F; Jin P; Wu H; Qin ZS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Mar; 43(5):2757-66. PubMed ID: 25722376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using methylation data to improve transcription factor binding prediction.
    Morgan D; DeMeo DL; Glass K
    Epigenetics; 2024 Dec; 19(1):2309826. PubMed ID: 38300850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
    Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
    Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving analysis of transcription factor binding sites within ChIP-Seq data based on topological motif enrichment.
    Worsley Hunt R; Mathelier A; Del Peso L; Wasserman WW
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):472. PubMed ID: 24927817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistics of protein-DNA binding and the total number of binding sites for a transcription factor in the mammalian genome.
    Kuznetsov VA; Singh O; Jenjaroenpun P
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20158869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of DNA Methylation on TFs in Human Embryonic Stem Cells.
    Luo X; Zhang T; Zhai Y; Wang F; Zhang S; Wang G
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():639461. PubMed ID: 33708244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DamID-seq: A Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Method that Captures Both Transient and Stable TF-DNA Interactions in Plant Cells.
    Alvarez JM; Hinckley WE; Leonelli L; Brooks MD; Coruzzi GM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2698():87-107. PubMed ID: 37682471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of transcription factors associated with DNA demethylation during human cellular development.
    Miyajima Y; Noguchi S; Tanaka Y; Li JR; Nishimura H; Kishima M; Lim J; Furuhata E; Suzuki T; Kasukawa T; Suzuki H
    Chromosome Res; 2022 Mar; 30(1):109-121. PubMed ID: 35142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MOCCS: Clarifying DNA-binding motif ambiguity using ChIP-Seq data.
    Ozaki H; Iwasaki W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Aug; 63():62-72. PubMed ID: 26971251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring transcription factor complexes from ChIP-seq data.
    Whitington T; Frith MC; Johnson J; Bailey TL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):e98. PubMed ID: 21602262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
    Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining phylogenetic footprinting with motif models incorporating intra-motif dependencies.
    Nettling M; Treutler H; Cerquides J; Grosse I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):141. PubMed ID: 28249564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An improved ChIP-seq peak detection system for simultaneously identifying post-translational modified transcription factors by combinatorial fusion, using SUMOylation as an example.
    Cheng CY; Chu CH; Hsu HW; Hsu FR; Tang CY; Wang WC; Kung HJ; Chang PC
    BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 24564277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-targeted transcription factors motifs are a systemic component of ChIP-seq datasets.
    Worsley Hunt R; Wasserman WW
    Genome Biol; 2014 Jul; 15(7):412. PubMed ID: 25070602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The next generation of transcription factor binding site prediction.
    Mathelier A; Wasserman WW
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(9):e1003214. PubMed ID: 24039567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.