These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37650641)

  • 21. Identifying transcription factors with cell-type specific DNA binding signatures.
    Awdeh A; Turcotte M; Perkins TJ
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Oct; 25(1):957. PubMed ID: 39402535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identifying the "stripe" transcription factors and cooperative binding related to DNA methylation.
    Luo X; Zou Q
    Commun Biol; 2024 Oct; 7(1):1265. PubMed ID: 39367138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using methylation data to improve transcription factor binding prediction.
    Morgan D; DeMeo DL; Glass K
    Epigenetics; 2024 Dec; 19(1):2309826. PubMed ID: 38300850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistics of protein-DNA binding and the total number of binding sites for a transcription factor in the mammalian genome.
    Kuznetsov VA; Singh O; Jenjaroenpun P
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20158869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nonconsensus Protein Binding to Repetitive DNA Sequence Elements Significantly Affects Eukaryotic Genomes.
    Afek A; Cohen H; Barber-Zucker S; Gordân R; Lukatsky DB
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004429. PubMed ID: 26285121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automated incorporation of pairwise dependency in transcription factor binding site prediction using dinucleotide weight tensors.
    Omidi S; Zavolan M; Pachkov M; Breda J; Berger S; van Nimwegen E
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1005176. PubMed ID: 28753602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. PscanChIP: Finding over-represented transcription factor-binding site motifs and their correlations in sequences from ChIP-Seq experiments.
    Zambelli F; Pesole G; Pavesi G
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Jul; 41(Web Server issue):W535-43. PubMed ID: 23748563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Crunch: integrated processing and modeling of ChIP-seq data in terms of regulatory motifs.
    Berger S; Pachkov M; Arnold P; Omidi S; Kelley N; Salatino S; van Nimwegen E
    Genome Res; 2019 Jul; 29(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 31138617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MEME-ChIP: motif analysis of large DNA datasets.
    Machanick P; Bailey TL
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 27(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 21486936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. abc4pwm: affinity based clustering for position weight matrices in applications of DNA sequence analysis.
    Ali O; Farooq A; Yang M; Jin VX; Bjørås M; Wang J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 23(1):83. PubMed ID: 35240993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
    Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inferring transcription factor complexes from ChIP-seq data.
    Whitington T; Frith MC; Johnson J; Bailey TL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):e98. PubMed ID: 21602262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combining phylogenetic footprinting with motif models incorporating intra-motif dependencies.
    Nettling M; Treutler H; Cerquides J; Grosse I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):141. PubMed ID: 28249564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. TFscope: systematic analysis of the sequence features involved in the binding preferences of transcription factors.
    Romero R; Menichelli C; Vroland C; Marin JM; Lèbre S; Lecellier CH; Bréhélin L
    Genome Biol; 2024 Jul; 25(1):187. PubMed ID: 38987807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of Co-Associated Transcription Factors via Ordered Adjacency Differences on Motif Distribution.
    Pan G; Tang J; Guo F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43597. PubMed ID: 28240320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discovering motifs in ranked lists of DNA sequences.
    Eden E; Lipson D; Yogev S; Yakhini Z
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Mar; 3(3):e39. PubMed ID: 17381235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measuring quantitative effects of methylation on transcription factor-DNA binding affinity.
    Zuo Z; Roy B; Chang YK; Granas D; Stormo GD
    Sci Adv; 2017 Nov; 3(11):eaao1799. PubMed ID: 29159284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Non-targeted transcription factors motifs are a systemic component of ChIP-seq datasets.
    Worsley Hunt R; Wasserman WW
    Genome Biol; 2014 Jul; 15(7):412. PubMed ID: 25070602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.