BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37651066)

  • 1. A comparative investigation of single nucleotide variant calling for a personal non-Caucasian sequencing sample.
    Park H; Gim J
    Genes Genomics; 2023 Dec; 45(12):1527-1536. PubMed ID: 37651066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative investigation of variant calling and genotyping for a single non-Caucasian whole genome.
    Park H; Gim J
    Res Sq; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36945432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical evaluation of variant calling accuracy using ultra-deep whole-genome sequencing data.
    Kishikawa T; Momozawa Y; Ozeki T; Mushiroda T; Inohara H; Kamatani Y; Kubo M; Okada Y
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1784. PubMed ID: 30741997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An optimized GATK4 pipeline for Plasmodium falciparum whole genome sequencing variant calling and analysis.
    Niaré K; Greenhouse B; Bailey JA
    Malar J; 2023 Jul; 22(1):207. PubMed ID: 37420214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
    Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance assessment of variant calling pipelines using human whole exome sequencing and simulated data.
    Kumaran M; Subramanian U; Devarajan B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31208315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers.
    Chen J; Li X; Zhong H; Meng Y; Du H
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9345. PubMed ID: 31249349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of whole-genome sequencing pipelines to minimize false negative findings.
    Hwang KB; Lee IH; Li H; Won DG; Hernandez-Ferrer C; Negron JA; Kong SW
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3219. PubMed ID: 30824715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and efficiency of germline variant calling pipelines for human genome data.
    Zhao S; Agafonov O; Azab A; Stokowy T; Hovig E
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20222. PubMed ID: 33214604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance characterization of PCR-free whole genome sequencing for clinical diagnosis.
    Zhou G; Zhou M; Zeng F; Zhang N; Sun Y; Qiao Z; Guo X; Zhou S; Yun G; Xie J; Wang X; Liu F; Fan C; Wang Y; Fang Z; Tian Z; Dai W; Sun J; Peng Z; Song L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Mar; 101(10):e28972. PubMed ID: 35451387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals.
    Cheng AY; Teo YY; Ong RT
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1707-13. PubMed ID: 24558117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants.
    Hwang S; Kim E; Lee I; Marcotte EM
    Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():17875. PubMed ID: 26639839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
    Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
    Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic diversity affects the accuracy of bacterial single-nucleotide polymorphism-calling pipelines.
    Bush SJ; Foster D; Eyre DW; Clark EL; De Maio N; Shaw LP; Stoesser N; Peto TEA; Crook DW; Walker AS
    Gigascience; 2020 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 32025702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of genotyping-by-sequencing analysis methods on low-coverage crop datasets shows advantages of a new workflow, GB-eaSy.
    Wickland DP; Battu G; Hudson KA; Diers BW; Hudson ME
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):586. PubMed ID: 29281959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal sequencing depth design for whole genome re-sequencing in pigs.
    Jiang Y; Jiang Y; Wang S; Zhang Q; Ding X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):556. PubMed ID: 31703550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality control and integration of genotypes from two calling pipelines for whole genome sequence data in the Alzheimer's disease sequencing project.
    Naj AC; Lin H; Vardarajan BN; White S; Lancour D; Ma Y; Schmidt M; Sun F; Butkiewicz M; Bush WS; Kunkle BW; Malamon J; Amin N; Choi SH; Hamilton-Nelson KL; van der Lee SJ; Gupta N; Koboldt DC; Saad M; Wang B; Nato AQ; Sohi HK; Kuzma A; ; Wang LS; Cupples LA; van Duijn C; Seshadri S; Schellenberg GD; Boerwinkle E; Bis JC; Dupuis J; Salerno WJ; Wijsman EM; Martin ER; DeStefano AL
    Genomics; 2019 Jul; 111(4):808-818. PubMed ID: 29857119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternate-locus aware variant calling in whole genome sequencing.
    Jäger M; Schubach M; Zemojtel T; Reinert K; Church DM; Robinson PN
    Genome Med; 2016 Dec; 8(1):130. PubMed ID: 27964746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An efficient and tunable parameter to improve variant calling for whole genome and exome sequencing data.
    Ahn YJ; Markkandan K; Baek IP; Mun S; Lee W; Kim HS; Han K
    Genes Genomics; 2018 Jan; 40(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 29892897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.