134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37652543)
21. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-targeted biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Kawada T; Yanagisawa T; Rajwa P; Sari Motlagh R; Mostafaei H; Quhal F; Laukhtina E; Aydh A; König F; Pallauf M; Pradere B; Ceci F; Baltzer PAT; Hacker M; Rasul S; Karakiewicz PI; Araki M; Nasu Y; Shariat SF
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 5(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 35715320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy.
Deniffel D; Perlis N; Ghai S; Girgis S; Healy GM; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7544-7554. PubMed ID: 35507051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23.
Liu C; Liu T; Zhang Z; Zhang N; Du P; Yang Y; Liu Y; Yu W; Li N; Gorin MA; Rowe SP; Zhu H; Yan K; Yang Z
J Nucl Med; 2020 Sep; 61(9):1314-1319. PubMed ID: 32034111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Beyond Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography PRIMARY Score in a Composite (P) Score for More Accurate Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Emmett L; Papa N; Hope TA; Fendler W; Calais J; Burger I; Eiber M; Barbato F; Moon D; Counter W; John N; Xue A; Franklin A; Thompson J; Rasiah K; Frydenberg M; Yaxley J; Buteau J; Agrawal S; Ho B; Nguyen A; Liu V; Lee J; Woo H; Hsiao E; Sutherland T; Perry E; Stricker P; Hofman MS; Kasivisvanathan V; Roberts M; Murphy D
J Urol; 2024 May; ():101097JU0000000000004010. PubMed ID: 38758680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Druskin SC; Tosoian JJ; Young A; Collica S; Srivastava A; Ghabili K; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE; Pavlovich CP
BJU Int; 2018 Apr; 121(4):619-626. PubMed ID: 29232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Which men with non-malignant pathology at magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy and persistent PI-RADS 3-5 lesions should repeat biopsy?
Castellani D; Pace G; Cecchini S; Franzese C; Cicconofri A; Romagnoli D; Del Rosso A; Possanzini M; Paci E; Dellabella M; Pierangeli T
Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):452.e9-452.e16. PubMed ID: 35871992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Correlation analysis between prostate imaging report and data system score and pathological results of prostate cancer].
Zhu LY; Ding XF; Huang TB; Luan Y; Guo CH; Xu YZ; Wang F
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 100(34):2663-2668. PubMed ID: 32921014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS
BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Using IsoPSA With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score May Help Refine Biopsy Decision Making in Patients With Elevated PSA.
Benidir T; Lone Z; Wood A; Abdallah N; Campbell R; Bajic P; Purysko A; Nguyen JK; Kaouk J; Haber GP; Eltemamy M; Stein R; Haywood S; Klein EA; Almassi N; Campbell SC; Abouassaly R; Weight CJ
Urology; 2023 Jun; 176():115-120. PubMed ID: 36965817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The PRIMARY Score: Diagnostic Performance and Added Value Compared With MRI in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Guo S; Kang F; Ma S; Jiao J; Ren J; Wang J; Zhang J; Qin W
Clin Nucl Med; 2024 Jan; 49(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 38081190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu K; Qin Z; Xue J; Miao C; Tian Y; Liu S; Zhu S; Gu Q; Hou C; Xu A; Yang J; Wang Z
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Dec; 8(6):741-753. PubMed ID: 32038971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer.
Venderink W; van der Leest M; van Luijtelaar A; van de Ven WJM; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ
World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1849-1855. PubMed ID: 28871396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Does previous prostate surgery affect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer? Results from a single institution series.
Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Sorce G; Barletta F; De Angelis M; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Prostate; 2022 Sep; 82(12):1170-1175. PubMed ID: 35538401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer with a deep learning approach: a multicentre retrospective study.
Zhao L; Bao J; Qiao X; Jin P; Ji Y; Li Z; Zhang J; Su Y; Ji L; Shen J; Zhang Y; Niu L; Xie W; Hu C; Shen H; Wang X; Liu J; Tian J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Feb; 50(3):727-741. PubMed ID: 36409317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [The value of machine learning models based on biparametric MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer].
Qiao XM; Hu CH; Hu S; Hu CH; Wang XM; Shen JK; Ji LB; Song Y; Bao J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 May; 103(19):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 37198106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Correlation between Prostate Cancer Positive Cores and 68Ga-PSMA Distribution in Prostate Gland.
Çankaya S; Caylan AE; Aydin F; Uçar M; Kutlu Ö
Urol Int; 2024; 108(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 38016433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
