These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37653279)

  • 21. Antisaccade Deficits in Schizophrenia Can Be Driven by Attentional Relevance of the Stimuli.
    Bansal S; Gaspar JM; Robinson BM; Leonard CJ; Hahn B; Luck SJ; Gold JM
    Schizophr Bull; 2021 Mar; 47(2):363-372. PubMed ID: 32766726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of the retinal size of a peripheral cue on attentional orienting in two- and three-dimensional worlds.
    Jiang Y; Li S; Li Y; Zeng H; Chen Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1285-92. PubMed ID: 27007477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Subjective time: cognitive and physical secondary tasks affect timing differently.
    Molet M; Alessandri J; Zentall TR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1344-53. PubMed ID: 21416457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multiple reward-cue contingencies favor expectancy over uncertainty in shaping the reward-cue attentional salience.
    De Tommaso M; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
    Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):332-346. PubMed ID: 29372304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evidence for different processes involved in the effects of nontemporal stimulus size and numerical digit value on duration judgments.
    Rammsayer TH; Verner M
    J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):13. PubMed ID: 27191941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Temporal expectancies and rhythmic cueing in touch: The influence of spatial attention.
    Jones A
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():140-150. PubMed ID: 30248473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Orienting of attention with and without cue awareness.
    Herreros L; Lambert AJ; Chica AB
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():165-171. PubMed ID: 28284987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shifts of visuospatial attention do not cause the spatial distortions of the Roelofs effect.
    Lester BD; Dassonville P
    J Vis; 2013 Oct; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 24105425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.
    Kosovicheva AA; Fortenbaugh FC; Robertson LC
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):33. PubMed ID: 21047765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Time estimation of fear cues in human observers.
    Grommet EK; Droit-Volet S; Gil S; Hemmes NS; Baker AH; Brown BL
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 20971168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cue validity effects in response preparation: a pupillometric study.
    Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1196():94-102. PubMed ID: 18222417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stereoscopic Slant Contrast and the Perception of Inducer Slant at Brief Stimulus Presentations.
    Harada S; Mitsudo H
    Perception; 2018 Feb; 47(2):171-184. PubMed ID: 29117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of attentional cueing on conscious awareness of stimulus and response.
    Johnson H; Haggard P
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jun; 150(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 12728292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Competition between newly recruited and pre-existing visual cues during the construction of visual appearance.
    Backus BT; Haijiang Q
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):919-24. PubMed ID: 17303207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vertical and horizontal meridian modulations suggest areas with quadrantic representations as neural locus of the attentional repulsion effect.
    Baumeler D; Born S
    J Vis; 2019 Jun; 19(6):15. PubMed ID: 31194221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of lateralized cues on the processing of lateralized auditory stimuli.
    Schröger E; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 1996 Jun; 43(3):203-26. PubMed ID: 8831955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of explicit cues on smooth pursuit termination.
    Miyamoto T; Miura K; Kizuka T; Ono S
    Vision Res; 2021 Dec; 189():27-32. PubMed ID: 34509706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional capture without awareness in complex visual tasks.
    Seya Y; Tsutsui KL; Watanabe K; Kimura K
    Perception; 2012; 41(5):517-31. PubMed ID: 23025157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.