These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37653732)

  • 21. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation: a retrospective analysis.
    Fan Z; Wu X; Guo Z; Shen N; Chen B; Xiang H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Feb; 25(1):186. PubMed ID: 38424576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion enhanced the recovery of patients with the lumbar degenerative disease compared with the conventional posterior procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang H; Cheng F; Hai Y; Liu Y; Pan A
    Front Neurol; 2022; 13():1089981. PubMed ID: 36703632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Novel Inextensible Endoscopic Tube Versus Traditional Extensible Retractor System in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Observation Study.
    Wu J; Zhang C; Lu K; Li C; Zhou Y
    Pain Physician; 2019 Nov; 22(6):E587-E599. PubMed ID: 31775412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Li Y; Cheng X; Chen B
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 36895012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single segmental lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis.
    Xue J; Song Y; Liu H; Liu L; Li T; Gong Q
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2022; 35(3):505-516. PubMed ID: 34602458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhu L; Cai T; Shan Y; Zhang W; Zhang L; Feng X
    Pain Physician; 2021 Sep; 24(6):441-452. PubMed ID: 34554684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Yu B; Zhang J; Pan J; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhao W; Wu D
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 33943023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].
    Zeng ZL; Jia L; Yu Y; Xu W; Hu X; Zhan XH; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 55(4):279-284. PubMed ID: 28355766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kou Y; Chang J; Guan X; Chang Q; Feng H
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e352-e368. PubMed ID: 34087465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the total and hidden blood loss in patients undergoing single-level open and unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective case control study.
    Peng YJ; Fan ZY; Wang QL; Dai J; Zhang QZ; Cao JY; Liu XF; Yan J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):295. PubMed ID: 37060012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison of clinical effect and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Li SB; Mei SQ; Xu WB; Fang XQ; Fan SW; Huang LB
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2023 May; 36(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 37211932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Feb; 13(1):328-337. PubMed ID: 33426744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Cui GY; Han XG; Wei Y; Liu YJ; He D; Sun YQ; Liu B; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 34516712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Tian Y; Liu X
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 26943871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).
    Liu G; Liu W; Jin D; Yan P; Yang Z; Liu R
    Spine J; 2023 Feb; 23(2):271-280. PubMed ID: 36252809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Clinical and radiologic comparison between oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Chen X; Wu LL; Yang ZC; Qiu YJ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2023 May; 36(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 37211931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang QY; Tan J; Huang K; Xie HQ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Sep; 22(1):802. PubMed ID: 34537023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up.
    Wang L; Li C; Wang Z; Li D; Tian Y; Yuan S; Liu X
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):473-485. PubMed ID: 35788970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.