These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37654828)

  • 1. Dental restoration selection by students at southern Saudi Arabian universities.
    Asiri W; Khan SD; Abdulkareem M; Abdullah H; Salah F; Nasseri K; Fayez F
    Bioinformation; 2022; 18(10):986-990. PubMed ID: 37654828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attitudes of some European dental undergraduate students to the placement of direct restorative materials in posterior teeth.
    Lynch CD; Guillem SE; Nagrani B; Gilmour AS; Ericson D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):916-26. PubMed ID: 20557432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.
    Dorri M; Martinez-Zapata MJ; Walsh T; Marinho VC; Sheiham Deceased A; Zaror C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
    Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Knowledge and attitudes of general dental practitioners towards posterior composite restorations in northern saudi arabia.
    Akbar I
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Feb; 9(2):ZC61-4. PubMed ID: 25859528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD010526. PubMed ID: 30834516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two different matrix band systems in restoring two surface cavities in posterior teeth done by senior undergraduate students at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    ; Ahmad MZ; Gaikwad RN; Arjumand B
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(4):459-464. PubMed ID: 30127197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Peltz I; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD010526. PubMed ID: 27780315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
    Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.
    Innes NP; Ricketts D; Chong LY; Keightley AJ; Lamont T; Santamaria RM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Dec; 2015(12):CD005512. PubMed ID: 26718872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oral Biofilm on Dental Materials Among Khat Chewers.
    Al Moaleem MM; Porwal A; Al Ahmari NM; Shariff M
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2020; 21(10):964-972. PubMed ID: 31965942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.
    Alkhudhairy F
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Nov; 9(1):488. PubMed ID: 27855718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
    Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association of oral hygiene habits and food intake with the risk of dental caries among undergraduate university women in Saudi Arabia.
    Musaiger AO; Al-Mannai M; Abduljawad E
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2014; 26(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 24486728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.