These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37654978)

  • 1. Analysis of the precision of modulation transfer function measurements with a circular edge: influence of object circularity.
    Maruyama S
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Jul; 10(4):043503. PubMed ID: 37654978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pitfall of using the circular-edge technique with image averaging for spatial resolution measurement in iteratively reconstructed CT images.
    Narita A; Ohkubo M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 31957969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation Analysis on the Performance of a Circular-Edge Technique in Measurements of the Modulation Transfer Function.
    Maruyama S
    J Med Phys; 2023; 48(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 37342601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of the two-dimensional presampled modulation transfer function of digital radiography devices using one-dimensional test objects.
    Wells JR; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6148-60. PubMed ID: 23039654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Accuracy of Modulation Transfer Function for Target Size and Field of View in a Circular Edge Strategy Using the CT Image Measurement Program].
    Fukunaga M; Onishi H; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Jun; 72(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 27320152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modulation transfer function measurement of CT images by use of a circular edge method with a logistic curve-fitting technique.
    Takenaga T; Katsuragawa S; Goto M; Hatemura M; Uchiyama Y; Shiraishi J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2015 Jan; 8(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 25142743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images.
    Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Budi WS; Haryanto F; Dougherty G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):244-252. PubMed ID: 30338920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of scattered radiation from a semitransparent edge on MTF measurement: verification of several factors by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Maruyama S; Shimosegawa M
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Jun; 43(2):547-556. PubMed ID: 32524439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of noise on MTF calculations using different phantoms.
    González-López A
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1889-1898. PubMed ID: 29500817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full 3-D modulation transfer function estimation of tomosynthesis system using modified Richardson-Lucy deconvolution.
    Song H; Lee C; Baek J
    Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2510-2525. PubMed ID: 38011539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of MTF measurements using edge method: towards reference data set.
    Viallefont-Robinet F; Helder D; Fraisse R; Newbury A; van den Bergh F; Lee D; Saunier S
    Opt Express; 2018 Dec; 26(26):33625-33648. PubMed ID: 30650795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the accuracy of MTF measurement at low frequencies based on oversampled edge spread function deconvolution.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Hao T; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(4):517-29. PubMed ID: 26410662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Method for estimating modulation transfer function from sample images.
    Saiga R; Takeuchi A; Uesugi K; Terada Y; Suzuki Y; Mizutani R
    Micron; 2018 Feb; 105():64-69. PubMed ID: 29179010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of the line-pair bar-pattern method in the measurement of the modulation transfer function (MTF) in megavoltage imaging.
    Gopal A; Samant SS
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 18293582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.
    Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Chen Y
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical Note: Accuracy of MTF measurements with an edge phantom at megavoltage x-ray energies.
    Loot K; Block A
    Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5685-5689. PubMed ID: 31580489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.