112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37655783)
1. Assessing socio-ecological factors on caesarean section and vaginal delivery: an extended perspective among women of South-Punjab, Pakistan.
Hassan MM; Ameeq M; Fatima L; Naz S; Sikandar SM; Kargbo A; Abbas S
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 44(1):2252983. PubMed ID: 37655783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Women's Preference Of Vaginal Or Caesarean Delivery: A Cross Sectional Study From A Tertiary Care Hospital In District Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Qamar MK; Shaikh BT; Afzal A; Qamar AK; Qamar YK
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2021; 33(2):222-225. PubMed ID: 34137533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors associated with caesarean deliveries among child-bearing women in Pakistan: secondary analysis of data from the Demographic and Health Survey, 2012-13.
Amjad A; Amjad U; Zakar R; Usman A; Zakar MZ; Fischer F
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Apr; 18(1):113. PubMed ID: 29685129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal Outcome in Cesarean Versus Normal Deliveries in Pregnancy with Meconium-stained Liquor: A Cross-sectional Study.
Jha UC; Dangal G
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2021 Apr; 19(1):107-110. PubMed ID: 33934143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Collaborative Randomised Amnioinfusion for Meconium Project (CRAMP): 1. South Africa.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoğlu AM; Buchmann E; Howarth GR; Shaw A; Nikodem VC; Cronje H; de Jager M; Mahomed K
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Mar; 105(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 9532991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence and determinants of Caesarean delivery in Punjab, Pakistan.
Abbas F; Ud Din RA; Sadiq M
East Mediterr Health J; 2019 Jan; 24(11):1058-1065. PubMed ID: 30701520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors Associated with Trial of Labour and Mode of Delivery in Robson Group 5: A Select Group of Women With Previous Caesarean Section.
Smithies M; Woolcott CG; Brock JK; Maguire B; Allen VM
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jun; 40(6):704-711. PubMed ID: 29503254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Frequency and Risk Factors Associated with Cesarean Section in Southern Punjab, Pakistan.
Rasool MF; Akhtar S; Hussain I; Majeed A; Imran I; Saeed H; Akbar M; Chaudhry MO; Rehman AU; Ashraf W; Alqahtani F; Alqhtani H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?
Angeja AC; Washington AE; Vargas JE; Gomez R; Rojas I; Caughey AB
BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 17014679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.
Bonzon M; Gross MM; Karch A; Grylka-Baeschlin S
Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():219-227. PubMed ID: 28478374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cross sectional analytic study of modes of delivery and caesarean section rates in a private health insured South African population.
Solanki G; Fawcus S; Daviaud E
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0219020. PubMed ID: 31247013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of counseling on the mode of breech birth: A single-center observational prospective study in The Netherlands.
Abdessalami S; Rota H; Pereira GD; Roest J; Rosman AN
Midwifery; 2017 Dec; 55():96-102. PubMed ID: 28987933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective study of effects of psychological factors and sleep on obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes among low-risk British Columbian women.
Hall WA; Stoll K; Hutton EK; Brown H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Aug; 12():78. PubMed ID: 22862846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.
Long Q; Kingdon C; Yang F; Renecle MD; Jahanfar S; Bohren MA; Betran AP
PLoS Med; 2018 Oct; 15(10):e1002672. PubMed ID: 30325928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlates of C-section in Punjab: a disaggregated analysis at the level of rural-urban residential status and place of delivery.
Abbas F; Amir-Ud-Din R
Women Health; 2019 Oct; 59(9):997-1014. PubMed ID: 30894083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in Punjab Pakistan: A single centre study.
Hafeez M; Ansari A; Parveen S; Salamat A; Aijaz A
J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Feb; 66(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 26819169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rates and Predictors of Caesarean Section for First and Second Births: A Prospective Cohort of Australian Women.
Hure A; Powers J; Chojenta C; Loxton D
Matern Child Health J; 2017 May; 21(5):1175-1184. PubMed ID: 28102500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing the mode of delivery and associated pregnancy outcomes for twins: a retrospective cohort study in a public hospital.
Liu AL; Yung WK; Yeung HN; Lai SF; Lam MT; Lai FK; Lo TK; Lau WL; Leung WC
Hong Kong Med J; 2012 Apr; 18(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 22477732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preference for mode of delivery in a low-risk population in Cape Town, South Africa.
Naudé N; Horak TA; Fawcus S; Stewart CJ; Lindow SW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():259-265. PubMed ID: 33032102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maternal perceptions about caesarean section deliveries and their role in reducing perinatal and neonatal mortality in the Upper West Region of Ghana; a cross-sectional study.
Naa Gandau BB; Nuertey BD; Seneadza NAH; Akaateba D; Azusong E; Yirifere JY; Kankpeyeng HB; Tette EMA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Oct; 19(1):350. PubMed ID: 31604461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
