130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37656072)
1. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium-molybdenum alloy closing loop archwires using numeric simulation model based on finite element method.
Mall V; Bhosale V; Vichare G; Patil A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Nov; 164(5):e129-e138. PubMed ID: 37656072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of force loss during sliding of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic archwires : An in vitro study.
Alsabti N; Bourauel C; Talic N
J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Jul; 82(4):218-225. PubMed ID: 33263771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of biomechanical effects between two types of 2 × 4 techniques employing a rocking-chair archwire: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Wang S; Hu M; Wang S; Qi H; Song D; Jiang H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Aug; 27(8):4617-4631. PubMed ID: 37294355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Effects of Various Alpha and Beta Angulations for T-loop Made of Stainless Steel and Titanium Molybdenum Archwires during Space Closure: Finite Element Method (FEM) Study.
Shinde S
Mymensingh Med J; 2023 Jul; 32(3):855-861. PubMed ID: 37391985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets.
Cash A; Curtis R; Garrigia-Majo D; McDonald F
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 14994890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Ricciardi A; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 14560269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
Husain N; Kumar A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.
Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative evaluation of metallurgical properties of stainless steel and TMA archwires with timolium and titanium niobium archwires--an in vitro study.
Vijayalakshmi RD; Nagachandran KS; Kummi P; Jayakumar P
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 20139569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research paper: The three-dimensional mechanical response of orthodontic archwires and brackets in vitro during simulated orthodontic torque.
Tran B; Nobes DS; Major PW; Carey JP; Romanyk DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Feb; 114():104196. PubMed ID: 33221162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element study of controlling factors of anterior intrusion and torque during Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Device (TSAD) dependent en masse retraction without posterior appliances:
Mo SS; Noh MK; Kim SH; Chung KR; Nelson G
Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):255-262. PubMed ID: 31589469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resistance to sliding of orthodontic archwires under increasing applied moments.
Youssef A; Dennis C; Beyer JP; Grünheid T
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020968027. PubMed ID: 33264051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Friction forces generated by aesthetic Gummetal® (Ti-Nb) orthodontic archwires: A comparative in vitro study.
Albawardi A; Warunek S; Makowka S; Al-Jewair T
Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100683. PubMed ID: 35995715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of torque expression between stainless steel, titanium molybdenum alloy, and copper nickel titanium wires in metallic self-ligating brackets.
Archambault A; Major TW; Carey JP; Heo G; Badawi H; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):884-9. PubMed ID: 20578859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
