These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37657396)

  • 1. Is numerical information always beneficial? Verbal and numerical cue-integration in additive and non-additive tasks.
    Collsiöö A; Juslin P; Winman A
    Cognition; 2023 Nov; 240():105584. PubMed ID: 37657396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis.
    Juslin P; Karlsson L; Olsson H
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):259-98. PubMed ID: 17376423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive changes between cue abstraction and exemplar memory in a multiple-cue judgment task with continuous cues.
    Karlsson L; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Dec; 14(6):1140-6. PubMed ID: 18229487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Go with the flow: How to master a nonlinear multiple-cue judgment task.
    Olsson AC; Enkvist T; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1371-84. PubMed ID: 17087590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exemplar effects in categorization and multiple-cue judgment.
    Juslin P; Olsson H; Olsson AC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Mar; 132(1):133-56. PubMed ID: 12656301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
    Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nothing compares: Unraveling learning task effects in judgment and categorization.
    Trippas D; Pachur T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2239-2266. PubMed ID: 30998071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning from observation, feedback, and intervention in linear and non-linear task environments.
    Henriksson MP; Enkvist T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):545-561. PubMed ID: 27882857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compound risk judgment in tasks with both idiosyncratic and systematic risk: The "Robust Beauty" of additive probability integration.
    Sundh J; Juslin P
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():25-41. PubMed ID: 29102806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why does cue polarity information provide benefits in inference problems? The role of strategy selection and knowledge of cue importance.
    von Helversen B; Karlsson L; Mata R; Wilke A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 23770569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do children profit from looking beyond looks? From similarity-based to cue abstraction processes in multiple-cue judgment.
    von Helversen B; Mata R; Olsson H
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jan; 46(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 20053019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of newly trained verbal and nonverbal labels for the cues in probabilistic category learning.
    Fotiadis FA; Protopapas A
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):112-25. PubMed ID: 23868697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Building Memory Representations for Exemplar-Based Judgment: A Role for Ventral Precuneus.
    Stillesjö S; Nyberg L; Wirebring LK
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():228. PubMed ID: 31379536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in learning and transfer: stable tendencies for learning exemplars versus abstracting rules.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Robbins M; Wiener C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):668-93. PubMed ID: 23750912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Competitive retrieval strategy causes multimodal response distributions in multiple-cue judgments.
    Albrecht R; Hoffmann JA; Pleskac TJ; Rieskamp J; von Helversen B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1064-1090. PubMed ID: 31750721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exemplar-based judgment or direct recall: On a problematic procedure for estimating parameters in exemplar models of quantitative judgment.
    Izydorczyk D; Bröder A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1495-1513. PubMed ID: 34109537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of working memory capacity in multiple-cue probability learning.
    Rolison JJ; Evans JS; Walsh CR; Dennis I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1494-514. PubMed ID: 21722064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of the role of some person and situation variables in multiple cue probability learning.
    Bayindir M; Bolger F; Say B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jan; 70(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 26595682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.